[rdo-list] Is Keystone/Identity-v3 supported by RDO Packstack? Multi-node swift --answer-file?

[Javier Pena]

----- Original Message -----
> Fairly certain Cinder is a known problem against v3 in Packstack [1]
> but I don't have the details.
> 
> [1]:
> https://github.com/openstack/packstack/blob/master/releasenotes/notes/keystone-v3-note-065b6302b49285f3.yaml
> 

We had a patch to fix that merged in Mitaka some time ago [1], which depended on a puppet-cinder patch [2]. We have not yet released a new package to the CBS repos, but you could try updating your openstack-packstack, openstack-packstack-puppet and openstack-puppet-modules using the packages from RDO stable/mitaka Trunk [3].

Regards,
Javier

[1] - https://review.openstack.org/323690
[2] - https://review.openstack.org/320956
[3] - http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/rdo-trunk-mitaka-tested/


> David Moreau Simard
> Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO
> 
> dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Taisto Qvist <taisto.qvist at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I've managed to create a fairly well working packstack-answer file, that I
> > used for liberty installations, with a 4-multi-node setup, eventually
> > handling nested kvm, live-migration, LBAAS, etc, so I am quite happy with
> > that.
> >
> > Now, my aim is Identity v3. From the packstack answer-file, it seems
> > supported, but I cant get it to work. I couldnt get it to work with
> > liberty,
> > and now testing with Mitaka, it still doesnt work, failing on:
> >
> > ERROR : Error appeared during Puppet run: 10.9.24.100_cinder.pp
> > Error: Could not prefetch cinder_type provider 'openstack': Execution of
> > '/usr/bin/openstack volume type list --quiet --format csv --long' returned
> > 1: Expecting to find domain in project - the server could not comply with
> > the request since it is either malformed or otherwise incorrect. The client
> > is assumed to be in error. (HTTP 400) (Request-ID:
> > req-d8cccfb9-c060-4cdd-867d-603bf70ebf24)
> >
> > I think this is also the same error I got, during my liberty tests.
> >
> > Has anyone got this working? Should it work?
> >
> > Another this which I just tested briefly, was to have swift-services on
> > separate nodes(instead of on the controller, as I have now), but I couldnt
> > get the syntax correct.
> >
> > Anyone have an answer-file example that configures multiple swift-nodes?
> >
> > Many Thanks,
> > Taisto Qvist
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rdo-list mailing list
> > rdo-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> >
> > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rdo-list mailing list
> rdo-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> 
> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>