[rdo-list] Updated mitaka stable images for tripleo

[Wesley Hayutin]

Sent from my mobile

On Aug 18, 2016 03:59, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: rdo-list-bounces at redhat.com <rdo-list-bounces at redhat.com> on behalf
of Haïkel <hguemar at fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 3:14 AM
> To: Hugh Brock
> Cc: Karanbir Singh; rdo-list
> Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Updated mitaka stable images for tripleo
>
> 2016-08-18 6:06 GMT+02:00 Hugh Brock <hbrock at redhat.com>:
> > On Aug 18, 2016 5:48 AM, "Graeme Gillies" <ggillies at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> In a follow up to my previous post about image building in tripleo/RDO,
> >> do we currently have a timeline, process, or anything else regarding
> >> when rebuilt tripleo images are rebuilt and uploaded to
> >> buildlogs.centos.org? E.g. if you look at the mitaka images
> >>
> >>
> >>
http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_images/mitaka/cbs/
> >>
> >> They were built back in April. Can we get something in place to have
> >> them updated more frequently?
> >>
>
> https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/rdo/images/
>
> I believe that here undercloud.qcow2 has been built in way different
> from Standard TripleO.  TripleO QS never/nowhere does
> # openstack overcloud image build --all
>
> Explained in details here
> https://bluejeans.com/s/a5ua/
> Blue Jeans Network | Video Collaboration in the Cloud
> bluejeans.com
> Blue Jeans Network - Interoperable, Cloud-based, Affordable Video
Conferencing Service
>
> Just in case snapshot is attached

Fyi
Unfortunately that is already out of date.  Tripleo-ci no longer creates an
undercloud image.

I'll send more details later.
>
> Thanks
> Boris
>
>
>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Graeme
> >>
> >> --
> >> Graeme Gillies
> >> Principal Systems Administrator
> >> Openstack Infrastructure
> >> Red Hat Australia
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rdo-list mailing list
> >> rdo-list at redhat.com
> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
> >
> > Graeme thanks for raising this.
> >
> > RDO folks, should we not be building images every time we promote? If
we are
> > doing that, should we not be linking them more obviously?
> >
> > -Hugh
> >
>
> Seems like sync is broken.
>
> @KB; maybe, I'm missing some context but since John is in PTO, can you
> look at it?
> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10697
>
> Regards,
> H.
>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rdo-list mailing list
> > rdo-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> >
> > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> rdo-list mailing list
> rdo-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>
> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> rdo-list mailing list
> rdo-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>
> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rdoproject.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20160819/0cbf92e8/attachment.html>