[rdo-list] Updated mitaka stable images for tripleo

[Boris Derzhavets]

________________________________
From: rdo-list-bounces at redhat.com <rdo-list-bounces at redhat.com> on behalf of Haïkel <hguemar at fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 3:14 AM
To: Hugh Brock
Cc: Karanbir Singh; rdo-list
Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Updated mitaka stable images for tripleo

2016-08-18 6:06 GMT+02:00 Hugh Brock <hbrock at redhat.com>:
> On Aug 18, 2016 5:48 AM, "Graeme Gillies" <ggillies at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In a follow up to my previous post about image building in tripleo/RDO,
>> do we currently have a timeline, process, or anything else regarding
>> when rebuilt tripleo images are rebuilt and uploaded to
>> buildlogs.centos.org? E.g. if you look at the mitaka images
>>
>>
>> http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_images/mitaka/cbs/
>>
>> They were built back in April. Can we get something in place to have
>> them updated more frequently?
>>

https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/rdo/images/

I believe that here undercloud.qcow2 has been built in way different
from Standard TripleO.  TripleO QS never/nowhere does
# openstack overcloud image build --all

Explained in details here
<https://bluejeans.com/playback/s/HNxEKizUWLsgcW3N7zvQdwFPRgBiQ2OQ8cR6frv9oLAS4VyEkNBBtlsgNStleehH#>https://bluejeans.com/s/a5ua/
Blue Jeans Network | Video Collaboration in the Cloud<https://bluejeans.com/s/a5ua/>
bluejeans.com
Blue Jeans Network - Interoperable, Cloud-based, Affordable Video Conferencing Service


Just in case snapshot is attached

Thanks
Boris

<https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/rdo/images/>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Graeme
>>
>> --
>> Graeme Gillies
>> Principal Systems Administrator
>> Openstack Infrastructure
>> Red Hat Australia
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rdo-list mailing list
>> rdo-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>
>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>
> Graeme thanks for raising this.
>
> RDO folks, should we not be building images every time we promote? If we are
> doing that, should we not be linking them more obviously?
>
> -Hugh
>

Seems like sync is broken.

@KB; maybe, I'm missing some context but since John is in PTO, can you
look at it?
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10697

Regards,
H.

>
> _______________________________________________
> rdo-list mailing list
> rdo-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>
> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com

_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list

To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rdoproject.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20160818/367c9e7e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screenshot from 2016-08-18 10-35-24.png
Type: image/png
Size: 432649 bytes
Desc: Screenshot from 2016-08-18 10-35-24.png
URL: <http://lists.rdoproject.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20160818/367c9e7e/attachment.png>