[Rdo-list] Follow up on Ceph and TripleO discussion @ Austin

[Ignacio Bravo]

Jewel has orders of magnitude improvements vs prior versions, so I’ll vote to have the latest release if possible in the shorter timeframe.

IB

__
Ignacio Bravo
LTG Federal, Inc
www.ltgfederal.com <http://www.ltgfederal.com/>


> On Apr 28, 2016, at 10:08 PM, François Cami <fcami at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> If that makes more sense for RDO, I'll prioritize rebuilding Jewel for
> CentOS (Storage SIG) next week instead of validating the latest Hammer
> rebuild.
> 
> Ignacio, Leif, David, does that work better for you?
> 
> François (CentOS Ceph Storage SIG maintainer)
> 
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Leif Madsen <lmadsen at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Does this seem like something that makes sense for a Copr setup? (I ask this
>> because because I'm a nub when it comes to Copr; I read about it today and
>> it sounds like perhaps the appropriate tool?)
>> 
>> Leif.
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:51 PM, David Moreau Simard <dms at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> From my past discussions with the Ceph team, it doesn't look like
>>> there are plans to provide upstream self-contained repositories for
>>> Ceph, at least in the short term.
>>> 
>>> I reached out today to the maintainer of the Ceph storage SIG repository
>>> [1].
>>> Right now, Hammer is available and is included when you install
>>> "centos-release-openstack-mitaka" on CentOS.
>>> 
>>> There are no plans to provide the Infernalis release but they really
>>> want to ship Jewel as it will be a long lived and supported version.
>>> The current estimate for Jewel brings us to the summer.
>>> 
>>> It's all down to time constraints, it seems like they could use some
>>> help if anyone is interested in providing assistance with this
>>> initiative.
>>> 
>>> If nothing has changed, the only dependency that isn't provided out of
>>> the box is leveldb.
>>> Perhaps another alternative would be to bring leveldb into the base OS
>>> repositories but that seems unlikely unless someone is willing to do
>>> that work.
>>> This is definitely uncharted territory for me.
>>> 
>>> [1]: https://github.com/CentOS-Storage-SIG/ceph
>>> 
>>> David Moreau Simard
>>> Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO
>>> 
>>> dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Ignacio Bravo <ibravo at ltgfederal.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> David,
>>>> 
>>>> Following up on the discussion today on etherpad at the RDO, is there
>>>> any
>>>> workaround to install Ceph Jewel (which requires epel) until
>>>> download.ceph.com includes no dependencies to epel?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> IB
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> __
>>>> Ignacio Bravo
>>>> LTG Federal, Inc
>>>> www.ltgfederal.com
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Rdo-list mailing list
>>> Rdo-list at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Leif Madsen | Partner Engineer - NFV & CI
>> NFV Partner Engineering
>> Red Hat
>> GPG: (D670F846) BEE0 336E 5406 42BA 6194  6831 B38A 291E D670 F846
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rdo-list mailing list
>> Rdo-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>> 
>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rdo-list mailing list
> Rdo-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> 
> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rdoproject.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20160428/30806aa8/attachment.html>