<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Jewel has orders of magnitude improvements vs prior versions, so I’ll vote to have the latest release if possible in the shorter timeframe.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">IB</div><div class=""><br class=""><div class="">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">__</div><div class="">Ignacio Bravo<br class="">LTG Federal, Inc</div><div class=""><a href="http://www.ltgfederal.com" class="">www.ltgfederal.com</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div></div></div><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Apr 28, 2016, at 10:08 PM, François Cami <<a href="mailto:fcami@redhat.com" class="">fcami@redhat.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="">Hi,<br class=""><br class="">If that makes more sense for RDO, I'll prioritize rebuilding Jewel for<br class="">CentOS (Storage SIG) next week instead of validating the latest Hammer<br class="">rebuild.<br class=""><br class="">Ignacio, Leif, David, does that work better for you?<br class=""><br class="">François (CentOS Ceph Storage SIG maintainer)<br class=""><br class="">On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Leif Madsen <<a href="mailto:lmadsen@redhat.com" class="">lmadsen@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Does this seem like something that makes sense for a Copr setup? (I ask this<br class="">because because I'm a nub when it comes to Copr; I read about it today and<br class="">it sounds like perhaps the appropriate tool?)<br class=""><br class="">Leif.<br class=""><br class="">On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:51 PM, David Moreau Simard <<a href="mailto:dms@redhat.com" class="">dms@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">From my past discussions with the Ceph team, it doesn't look like<br class=""></blockquote>there are plans to provide upstream self-contained repositories for<br class="">Ceph, at least in the short term.<br class=""><br class="">I reached out today to the maintainer of the Ceph storage SIG repository<br class="">[1].<br class="">Right now, Hammer is available and is included when you install<br class="">"centos-release-openstack-mitaka" on CentOS.<br class=""><br class="">There are no plans to provide the Infernalis release but they really<br class="">want to ship Jewel as it will be a long lived and supported version.<br class="">The current estimate for Jewel brings us to the summer.<br class=""><br class="">It's all down to time constraints, it seems like they could use some<br class="">help if anyone is interested in providing assistance with this<br class="">initiative.<br class=""><br class="">If nothing has changed, the only dependency that isn't provided out of<br class="">the box is leveldb.<br class="">Perhaps another alternative would be to bring leveldb into the base OS<br class="">repositories but that seems unlikely unless someone is willing to do<br class="">that work.<br class="">This is definitely uncharted territory for me.<br class=""><br class="">[1]: <a href="https://github.com/CentOS-Storage-SIG/ceph" class="">https://github.com/CentOS-Storage-SIG/ceph</a><br class=""><br class="">David Moreau Simard<br class="">Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO<br class=""><br class="">dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Ignacio Bravo <<a href="mailto:ibravo@ltgfederal.com" class="">ibravo@ltgfederal.com</a>><br class="">wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">David,<br class=""><br class="">Following up on the discussion today on etherpad at the RDO, is there<br class="">any<br class="">workaround to install Ceph Jewel (which requires epel) until<br class=""><a href="http://download.ceph.com" class="">download.ceph.com</a> includes no dependencies to epel?<br class=""><br class="">Thanks,<br class="">IB<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">__<br class="">Ignacio Bravo<br class="">LTG Federal, Inc<br class=""><a href="http://www.ltgfederal.com" class="">www.ltgfederal.com</a><br class=""><br class=""></blockquote><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Rdo-list mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Rdo-list@redhat.com" class="">Rdo-list@redhat.com</a><br class="">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list<br class=""><br class="">To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com<br class=""></blockquote><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">--<br class="">Leif Madsen | Partner Engineer - NFV & CI<br class="">NFV Partner Engineering<br class="">Red Hat<br class="">GPG: (D670F846) BEE0 336E 5406 42BA 6194 6831 B38A 291E D670 F846<br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Rdo-list mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Rdo-list@redhat.com" class="">Rdo-list@redhat.com</a><br class="">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list<br class=""><br class="">To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Rdo-list mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Rdo-list@redhat.com" class="">Rdo-list@redhat.com</a><br class="">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list<br class=""><br class="">To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com</div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>