[Rdo-list] RDO Manager status for Liberty GA
Ignacio Bravo
ibravo at ltgfederal.com
Fri Oct 23 03:05:30 UTC 2015
I just finalized my first successful install of RDO Manager. All I can say is guau! What a beauty! It just does everything auto-magically. Impressive.
I will need to go into the network isolation and multiple Ceph nodes now, but it is definitely amazing. Good work and thanks to ohochman, sasha21 and trown for all the long irc chats.
IB
__
Ignacio Bravo
LTG Federal, Inc
www.ltgfederal.com <http://www.ltgfederal.com/>
> On Oct 22, 2015, at 4:49 PM, Omri Hochman <ohochman at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ignacio Bravo" <ibravo at ltgfederal.com>
>> To: "Omri Hochman" <ohochman at redhat.com>
>> Cc: rdo-list at redhat.com
>> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 4:30:22 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Rdo-list] RDO Manager status for Liberty GA
>>
>> Do I have to have network isolation for a test HA environment? Something
>> like:
>>
>> openstack overcloud deploy --templates --control-scale 3 --compute-scale 1
>> --ceph-storage-scale 1
>> -e
>> /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/storage-environment.yaml
>> -e
>> /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/puppet-pacemaker.yaml
>> --ntp-server 10.5.26.10 --neutron-network-type vxlan --neutron-tunnel-types
>> vxlan --timeout 90
>>
>
>> I wanted to leave network isolation for my last test (after the others have
>> passed) :)
>> That way, I don’t require yet the
>>
>> -e /home/stack/network-environment.yaml
>>
>> and the modifications of the nic-config files, and most importantly, reading
>> the network isolation part just yet.
>
> Sure,
>
> You should be able to get successful BM HA deployment without doing network-isolation,
>
> and I think the deployment command you suggested here ^^ should be good for that.
>
> Omri.
>
>>
>>
>> IB
>>
>>
>>
>> __
>> Ignacio Bravo
>> LTG Federal, Inc
>> www.ltgfederal.com <http://www.ltgfederal.com/>
>>
>>> On Oct 22, 2015, at 3:47 PM, Omri Hochman <ohochman at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey Ignacio,
>>>
>>> I guess you can use my file as example ( I've switched the internal IPs
>>> with 'XX.XX.XX.XX' )
>>> http://paste.openstack.org/show/477193/
>>>
>>> Note: that configuration file is fit to my environment and It's according
>>> the native vlans that already pre-configured on the switch.
>>> you will also need to create all the network-isolation configuration yaml
>>> files under /home/stack/nic-configs
>>>
>>> [ohochman at dhcp-1-111 nic-configs_new]$ ls
>>> ceph-storage.yaml cinder-storage.yaml compute.yaml controller.yaml
>>> swift-storage.yaml
>>>
>>> Try to according :
>>> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tripleo-docs/advanced_deployment/network_isolation.html
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Omri.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Ignacio Bravo" <ibravo at ltgfederal.com>
>>>> To: rdo-list at redhat.com
>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 2:49:55 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Rdo-list] RDO Manager status for Liberty GA
>>>>
>>>> Omri,
>>>>
>>>> I was looking at the successful HA deployment in BM that you commented =
>>>>
>>>> openstack overcloud deploy --templates --control-scale 3 --compute-scale 1
>>>> --ceph-storage-scale 1 -e
>>>> /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/storage-environment.yaml
>>>> -e /home/stack/network-environment.yaml -e
>>>> /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/puppet-pacemaker.yaml
>>>> --ntp-server 10.5.26.10 --neutron-network-type vxlan
>>>> --neutron-tunnel-types
>>>> vxlan --timeout 9
>>>>
>>>> Can you share the contents of your/home/stack/network-environment.yaml
>>>> file?
>>>> I couldn't find this file in the undercloud machine, and want to make sure
>>>> I
>>>> get a successful deployment. Feel free to replace any confidential
>>>> information.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> IB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ignacio Bravo
>>>> LTG Federal Inc
>>>>
>>>> On 10/21/2015 02:30 PM, Omri Hochman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Omri Hochman" <ohochman at redhat.com>
>>>>>> To: "Pedro Sousa" <pgsousa at gmail.com>
>>>>>> Cc: "rdo-list" <rdo-list at redhat.com>
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 11:16:03 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Rdo-list] RDO Manager status for Liberty GA
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> From: "Pedro Sousa" <pgsousa at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> To: "John Trowbridge" <trown at redhat.com>
>>>>>>> Cc: "rdo-list" <rdo-list at redhat.com>
>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 7:10:38 AM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Rdo-list] RDO Manager status for Liberty GA
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've managed to install on baremetal following this howto:
>>>>>>> https://remote-lab.net/rdo-manager-ha-openstack-deployment/ (based on
>>>>>>> liberty)
>>>>>> Hey Pedro,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you using: yum install -y
>>>>>> http://rdoproject.org/repos/openstack-liberty/rdo-release-liberty.rpm
>>>>>> to get the latest RDO GA bits ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We're failing in overcloud deployment on BM with several issues.
>>>>> Actually, an update :
>>>>>
>>>>> After using the workaround from this issue:
>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271289#c9
>>>>>
>>>>> We've manage to get HA on Bare-Metal (*using the latest
>>>>> rdo-release-liberty.rpm)
>>>>>
>>>>> That was the deployment command :
>>>>>
>>>>> openstack overcloud deploy --templates --control-scale 3 --compute-scale
>>>>> 1
>>>>> --ceph-storage-scale 1 -e
>>>>> /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/storage-environment.yaml
>>>>> -e /home/stack/network-environment.yaml -e
>>>>> /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/puppet-pacemaker.yaml
>>>>> --ntp-server 10.5.26.10 --neutron-network-type vxlan
>>>>> --neutron-tunnel-types vxlan --timeout 90
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Omri.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have 3 Controllers + 1 Compute (HA and Network Isolation). However
>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>> having some issues logging on (maybe some keystone issue) and some
>>>>>>> issue
>>>>>>> with openvswitch that I'm trying to address with Marius Cornea help.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Pedro Sousa
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:54 AM, John Trowbridge < trown at redhat.com >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hola rdoers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The plan is to GA RDO Liberty today (woot!), so I wanted to send out a
>>>>>>> status update for the RDO Manager installer. I would also like to
>>>>>>> gather
>>>>>>> feedback on how other community participants feel about that status as
>>>>>>> it relates to RDO Manager participating in the GA. That feedback can
>>>>>>> come as replies to this thread, or even better there is a packaging
>>>>>>> meeting on #rdo at 1500 UTC today and we can discuss it further then.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> tldr;
>>>>>>> RDO Manager installs with 3 controllers, 1 compute, and 1 ceph on
>>>>>>> virtual hardware have been verified to work with GA bits, however bare
>>>>>>> metal installs have not yet been verified.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to start with some historical context here, as it seems we
>>>>>>> have picked up quite a few new active community members recently (again
>>>>>>> woot!). When RDO Kilo GA'd, RDO Manager was barely capable of a
>>>>>>> successful end to end demo with a single controller and single compute
>>>>>>> node, and only by using a special delorean server pulling bits from a
>>>>>>> special github organization (rdo-management). We were able to get it
>>>>>>> consistently deploying **virtual** HA w/ ceph in CI by the middle of
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> Liberty upstream cycle. Then, due largely to the fact that there was
>>>>>>> nobody being paid to work full time on RDO Manager, and the people who
>>>>>>> were contributing in more or less "extra" time were getting swamped
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> releasing RHEL OSP 7, CI on the Kilo bits became mostly red with brief
>>>>>>> 24 hour periods where someone would spend a weekend fixing things only
>>>>>>> to have it break again early the following week.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There have been many improvements in the recent weeks to this sad state
>>>>>>> of affairs. Firstly, we have upstreamed almost everything from the
>>>>>>> rdo-management github org directly into openstack projects. Secondly,
>>>>>>> there is a single source for delorean packages for both core openstack
>>>>>>> packages and the tripleo and ironic packages that make up RDO Manager.
>>>>>>> These two things may seem a bit trivial to a newcomer to the project,
>>>>>>> but they are actually fixes for the biggest cause of the RDO Manager
>>>>>>> Kilo CI breaking. I think with those two fixes (plus some work on
>>>>>>> upstream tripleo CI) we have set ourselves up to make steady forward
>>>>>>> progress rather than spending all our time troubleshooting complete
>>>>>>> breakages. (Although this is still openstack so complete breakages will
>>>>>>> still happen from time to time :p)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Another very easy to overlook improvement over where we were at Kilo
>>>>>>> GA,
>>>>>>> is that we actually have all RDO Manager packages (minus a couple EPEL
>>>>>>> dep stragglers[1]) in the official RDO GA repo. When RDO Kilo GA'd, we
>>>>>>> did not even have everything officially packaged, rather only in our
>>>>>>> special delorean instance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All this leads to my opinion that RDO Manager should participate in the
>>>>>>> RDO GA. I am unconvinced that bare metal installs can not be made to
>>>>>>> work with some extra documentation or configuration changes. However,
>>>>>>> even if that is not the case, we are in a drastically better place than
>>>>>>> we were at the beginning of the Kilo cycle.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That said, this is a community, and I would like to hear how other
>>>>>>> community participants both from RDO in general and RDO Manager
>>>>>>> specifically feel about this. Ideally, if someone thinks the RDO
>>>>>>> Manager
>>>>>>> release should be blocked, there should be a BZ with the blocker flag
>>>>>>> proposed so that there is actionable criteria to unblock the release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for all your hard work to get to this point, and lets keep it
>>>>>>> rolling.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -trown
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273541
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Rdo-list mailing list
>>>>>>> Rdo-list at redhat.com
>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Rdo-list mailing list
>>>>>>> Rdo-list at redhat.com
>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Rdo-list mailing list
>>>>>> Rdo-list at redhat.com
>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Rdo-list mailing list
>>>>> Rdo-list at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Rdo-list mailing list
>>>> Rdo-list at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>>>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rdoproject.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20151022/d7fda31b/attachment.html>
More information about the dev
mailing list