[Rdo-list] Packaging the big tent (or at least part of it)

[Rich Bowen]

On 05/28/2015 06:58 AM, Alan Pevec wrote:
>> Don't we plan to drop Fedora dist-git? My understanding from RDO
>> meetup at the summit is that that's the plan, unless someone has clear
>
> I was not at meetup but that's not my conclusion from the notes in
> etherpad https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO_Vancouver
> Rich, do you have an usable voice recording of the meetup or more
> detailed notes?

I have the recording, but I haven't had an opportunity to edit it yet. 
It's on my list for today.

--Rich


>
> Before the meetup I did add few lines at the bottom of == Packaging ==
> section regarding RDO==Delorean, but I didn't see any comments.
> We cannot say RDO==Delorean and github/openstack-packages rpm-<branch>
> are not enough to be used as dist-git.
>
>> objections (like Fedora Infra relying on packages to run their
>> infrastructure; though in that case we would already have a problem,
>> since we dropped non-rawhide branches anyway).
>
> We did not drop anything, yet, until we have alternative home for dist-git.
>
>> Also, we have packages that are not in Fedora (openstack-designate,
>> openstack-neutron-*aas, python-networking-*).
>
> Until we have dist-git ready in git.centos.org please do open Fedora
> review requests so we can have dist-git for them.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Alan
>


-- 
Rich Bowen - rbowen at redhat.com
OpenStack Community Liaison
http://rdoproject.org/