[Rdo-list] Integration of MidoNet into RDO Manager
Sandro Mathys
sandro at mathys.io
Thu Jul 30 16:38:57 UTC 2015
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Adam Young <ayoung at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/30/2015 07:14 AM, Perry Myers wrote:
>>>
>>> >Well, for our packages, Fedora and EL would be fairly different. The
>>> >MidoNet core is written in Java/Scala, so much more (tools, deps) is
>>> >missing from EL, e.g. gradle and of course lots of artifacts. So we
>>> >should target EPEL, I guess.
>>
>> I wouldn't follow Adam's advice here (starting with Fedora). Especially
>> for the SDN solution which is Java based. That would lead to a lot of
>> pain and overhead.
>>
> Heh...I still stand by it. But, to be clear: make sure the parts that you
> want to ship with RDO are build able on Fedora; We want to be able to test
> against as far upstream as possible. I tend to develop on Fedora and then
> test against Centos and RHEL.
Personally, I would also do it that way - but I can't guarantee that
everyone involved will follow that approach.
> For the Java stuff....yeah, it can be a lot of work, but ultimately is worth
> the effort. We went through a lot of packaging pain for Dogtag, whcih is
> part of Barbican...Dogtag was, I think, the first Tomcat Application that
> got into Fedora. WIth JPackage etc, getting RPMs for the Software you have
> is manageable. But all that is is beyond the string need for the Neutron
> Plugin.
>
>
> SO, it depends on how far you want to go. If you only care about getting
> the plugin into RDO, yeah, you don't need to package the Java code. If you
> want to participate in the RDO and Fedora communities, I'd recommend getting
> the packages done correctly, but that can be done over time.
I agree, but it will take a very long time to achieve this.
> I'd recommend looking into hosting COPR for the components you want to
> build. You can start with the easy ones.
>
> The Fedora Java team has done a lot of work on getting Maven builds to be
> able to select only packages that are themselves part of Fedora. You might
> be surprised at how much packaging you don't actually have to write today.
> As an added benefit, you get code that will help you installing the rest of
> MidoNet on a RHEL system.
Well, we currently use gradle, not maven - but as of F22 gradle and
gradle-local are available as well. However, trying to build MidoNet,
I didn't even get past the build dependencies (gradle plugins, I
think). Having packaged ant and maven based stuff for Fedora before, I
was rather surprised how fast it failed ;) But I get your point :)
-- Sandro
> _______________________________________________
> Rdo-list mailing list
> Rdo-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>
> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
More information about the dev
mailing list