[rdo-list] OVS 2.8 in CentOS SIGs WAS Re: OVS 2.7 on rdo

[Numan Siddique]

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:16 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Numan Siddique <nusiddiq at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:52 AM, Alan Pevec <apevec at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Numan Siddique <nusiddiq at redhat.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Alan,
> >> >
> >> > OVS 2.8 is now availalbe [1] and we would like to have it in RDO.
> >> >
> >> > Is it possible to have the OVS 2.8 rpms in candidate repo. I will
> update
> >> > the
> >> > patch [2] and make sure it passes so that we don't see any regressions
> >> > during update.
> >> >
> >> > [1] -
> >> >
> >> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2017-
> September/045235.html
> >> > [2] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/473191/
> >>
> >> Hi Numan,
> >>
> >> I've rebased two patches we have in RDO [3] rebuilds, on top of
> >> Timothy's Fedora 28 RPM [4] and it almost worked, only ppc64le arch
> >> build [5] failed with:
> >>
> >> |
> >> /builddir/build/BUILD/openvswitch-2.8.0/dpdk-stable-
> 17.05.1/ppc_64-power8-linuxapp-gcc/lib/librte_eal.a(eal_common_options.o):
> >> In function `eal_plugins_init':
> >> |
> >> /builddir/build/BUILD/openvswitch-2.8.0/dpdk-stable-
> 17.05.1/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c:240:
> >> undefined reference to `dlopen'
> >> |
> >> /builddir/build/BUILD/openvswitch-2.8.0/dpdk-stable-
> 17.05.1/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c:242:
> >> undefined reference to `dlerror'
> >> | collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> >>
> >> ppc64le folks, please help!
> >>
> >
> >
> > Thanks Alan. Hope the build would be resolved soon.
>
> I looked at this briefly.  The compile error is odd, but we wouldn't
> even hit that if the initial testcase run completed successfully.
> There are two unexpected failures:
>
> 2355: ovn -- dns lookup : 1 HV, 2 LS, 2 LSPs/LS       FAILED (ovn.at:6812)
> 2364: ovn -- ensure one gw controller restart in HA doesn't bounce the
> master FAILED (ovn.at:8480)
>

This is odd. Are the tests failing consistently ? I will have a look.

Thanks
Numan


>
> Not sure why those two failed.
>
> josh
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rdoproject.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20170919/c7e040ac/attachment.html>