[rdo-list] logs.rdoproject.org pruning

[Haïkel Guémar]

On 17/10/2017 05:38, David Moreau Simard wrote:
> The idea is to maximize our usage of this 2TB without going over a
> certain treshold.
> We'll tweak retention to keep logs as long as possible while keeping
> sufficient enough buffer in terms of space.
> 
> For now we're trying 60 days, if we can do it and stay within that
> treshold, we'll keep 60 days!
> 

Concerning packages reviews, 30/35 would be ok. Anything older would 
mean to recheck jobs anyway.
Ack for 60.

H.

> David Moreau Simard
> Senior Software Engineer | OpenStack RDO
> 
> dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]
> 
> 
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayutin at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Thanks David,
>> I think 30 - 35 days is sufficient for your reference.
>> The upstream requirement is 30 days :)
>> Thanks for taking care of it!!
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:43 PM, David Moreau Simard <dms at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We've hit 1.5TB out of 2TB on logs.rdoproject.org and it's time to
>>> look at what kind of retention this gets us.
>>> logs.rdoproject.org aggregates logs from ci.centos.org,
>>> review.rdoproject.org as well as third party logs.
>>>
>>> We have about 90 days worth of data right now but we're also
>>> increasing the pace at which we're uploading new data as we are
>>> migrating new TripleO jobs to review.rdoproject.org.
>>> I've set pruning to 60 days for the time being and we will monitor how
>>> things are looking in the near future.
>>>
>>> David Moreau Simard
>>> Senior Software Engineer | OpenStack RDO
>>>
>>> dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]
>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rdo-list mailing list
> rdo-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> 
> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>