[rdo-dev] ppc64le and erlang-sd_notify

Haïkel Guémar hguemar at redhat.com
Tue Dec 19 09:10:57 UTC 2017


On 19/12/2017 02:48, Tony Breeds wrote:
> Hi All,
>      When trying to install/test RDO on a ppc64le system we hit an issue
> that with
> 
> ---
> Error: Package: erlang-sd_notify-0.1-9.el7.ppc64le (delorean-queens-testing)
>             Requires: erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.11
>             Available: erlang-erts-R16B-03.18.el7.ppc64le (epel)
>                 erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.4
>             Available: erlang-erts-18.3.4.5-4.el7.ppc64le (delorean-queens-testing)
>                 erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
> Error: Package: erlang-sd_notify-0.1-9.el7.ppc64le (delorean-queens-testing)
>             Requires: erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.11
>             Available: erlang-erts-R16B-03.18.el7.ppc64le (epel)
>                 erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.4
>             Installing: erlang-erts-18.3.4.5-4.el7.ppc64le (delorean-queens-testing)
>                 erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
>   You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
>   You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
> ---
> 
> It seems that at the time erlang-sd_notify there was a divergence in the
> nif_version provided by ppc64le.  You can see that here:
> 
> erlang-sd_notify-0.1-9.el7.aarch64.rpm	erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
> erlang-sd_notify-0.1-9.el7.ppc64le.rpm	erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.11
> erlang-sd_notify-0.1-9.el7.x86_64.rpm	erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
> 
> I've rebuilt erlang-sd_notify (https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=270238)
> and now the nif_version is consistent:
> erlang-sd_notify-0.1-10.el7.aarch64.rpm	erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
> erlang-sd_notify-0.1-10.el7.ppc64le.rpm	erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
> erlang-sd_notify-0.1-10.el7.x86_64.rpm	erlang(erl_nif_version) = 2.10
> 
> Here's where I continue to be confused about how I get this into
> queens-testing.
> 
> I think the right thing to do is update the
> cloud7-openstack-queens-testing version in deps.yaml which I thinkI've
> done with https://review.rdoproject.org/r/11040
> 
> So am I on the right track to fix this, if not let me know where I've
> gone wrong.
> 

Hi Tony,

You did it right. FYI, we're having issues currently with nodepool so 
the gate is down, so do not worry if it is not merged right away.

> 
> Yours Tony.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at lists.rdoproject.org
> http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> 
> To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscribe at lists.rdoproject.org
> 



More information about the dev mailing list