[rdo-list] Baremetal Tripleo stable version?
Marius Cornea
marius at remote-lab.net
Mon Jun 6 12:19:39 UTC 2016
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Christopher Brown <cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 12:13 +0100, Marius Cornea wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Christopher Brown <cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk
>> > wrote:
>
[...]
>
> Running this command you see something like:
>
> [2016-06-04 10:57:09,195] (heat-config) [WARNING] Skipping config
> b28e3adb-ed18-4e74-94cf-260c3c1eefec, already deployed
> [2016-06-04 10:57:09,195] (heat-config) [WARNING] To force-deploy, rm
> /var/lib/heat-config/deployed/b28e3adb-ed18-4e74-94cf-260c3c1eefec.json
>
> Once we do this then the deployment continues.
>
> Hoep this helps - thanks to Pedro for pointing me in the right
> direction.
A couple of thoughts about this: if it is STP causing timeouts due to
the transitioning states I'd expect the dhcp requests to time out
earlier, during pxe boot. I think we should add this to the docs, that
the switch ports where the provisioning nic is connected should be
configured as portfast, otherwise you might see dhcp timeouts due to
the convergence time.
>From what I can see the nodes got stuck later in the deployment
process, unable to reach the metadata server, which runs on the
undercloud. When I hit such issue I usually try to see if I get any
respone by 'curl http://169.254.169.254' and then proceed to debug if
it doesn't work. In the past I've seen several causes for this such as
incorrect routing tables set by the nic templates ( you can check it
by 'ip r get 169.254.169.254' and see that the router corresponds to
the underclud IP address) or iptables rules on the undercloud that
blocked access to the metadata server. If it seems stuck without no
actual reason it's also worth trying to restart os-collect-config by
systemctl
>
>> >
>> > Happy to help out with documentation and keeping errata/workarounds
>> > up
>> > to date - I think we just need a "stable" section of the website
>> > which
>> > doesn't seem to exist at the moment.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 00:37 +0100, Graeme Gillies wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi Everyone,
>> > >
>> > > I just wanted to say I have been following this thread quite
>> > > closely
>> > > and
>> > > can sympathize with some of the pain people are going through to
>> > > get
>> > > tripleO to work.
>> > >
>> > > Currently it's quite difficult and a bit opaque on how to
>> > > actually
>> > > utilise the stable mitaka repos in order to build a functional
>> > > undercloud and overcloud environment.
>> > >
>> > > First I wanted to share the steps I have undergone in order to
>> > > get a
>> > > functional overcloud working with RDO Mitaka utilising the RDO
>> > > stable
>> > > release built by CentOS, and then I'll talk about some specific
>> > > steps
>> > > I
>> > > think need to be undertaken by the RDO/TripleO team in order to
>> > > provide
>> > > a better experience in the future.
>> > >
>> > > To get a functional overcloud using RDO Mitaka, you need to do
>> > > the
>> > > following
>> > >
>> > > 1) Install EPEL on your undercloud
>> > > 2) Install https://www.rdoproject.org/repos/rdo-release.rpm on
>> > > your
>> > > undercloud
>> > > 3) Following the normal steps to install your undercloud
>> > > (modifying
>> > > undercloud.conf, and running openstack undercloud install
>> > > 4) You will now need to manually patch ironic on the undercloud
>> > > in
>> > > order
>> > > to make sure repeated introspection works. This might not be
>> > > needed
>> > > if
>> > > you don't do any introspection, but I find more often than not
>> > > you
>> > > end
>> > > up having to do it, so it's worthwhile. The bug you need to patch
>> > > is
>> > > [1]
>> > > and I typically run the following commands to apply the patch
>> > >
>> > > # sudo su -
>> > > $ cd /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages
>> > > $ curl
>> > > 'https://review.openstack.org/changes/306421/revisions/abd50d8438
>> > > e7d3
>> > > 71ce24f97d8f8f67052b562007/patch?download'
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > base64 -d | patch -p1
>> > > $ systemctl restart openstack-ironic-inspector
>> > > $ systemctl restart openstack-ironic-inspector-dnsmasq
>> > > $ exit
>> > > #
>> > >
>> > > 5) Manually patch the undercloud to build overcloud images using
>> > > rhos-release rpm only (which utilises the stable Mitaka repo from
>> > > CentOS, and nothing from RDO Trunk [delorean]). I do this by
>> > > modifying
>> > > the file
>> > >
>> > > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-
>> > > packages/tripleoclient/v1/overcloud_image.py
>> > >
>> > > At around line 467 you will see a reference to epel, I add a new
>> > > line
>> > > after that to include the rdo_release DIB element to the build as
>> > > well.
>> > > This typically makes the file look something like
>> > >
>> > > http://paste.openstack.org/show/508196/
>> > >
>> > > (note like 468). Then I create a directory to store my images and
>> > > build
>> > > them specifying the mitaka version of rdo_release. I then upload
>> > > these
>> > > images
>> > >
>> > > # mkdir ~/images
>> > > # cd ~/images
>> > > # export RDO_RELEASE=mitaka
>> > > # openstack overcloud image build --all
>> > > # openstack overcloud image upload --update-existing
>> > >
>> > > 6) Because of the bug at [2] which affects the ironic agent
>> > > ramdisk,
>> > > we
>> > > need to build a set of images utilising RDO Trunk for the mitaka
>> > > branch
>> > > (where the fix is applied), and then upload *only* the new ironic
>> > > ramdisk. This is done with
>> > >
>> > > # mkdir ~/images-mitaka-trunk
>> > > # cd ~/images-mitaka-trunk
>> > > # export USE_DELOREAN_TRUNK=1
>> > > # export
>> > > DELOREAN_TRUNK_REPO="http://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-mitaka/c
>> > > urre
>> > > nt/"
>> > > # export DELOREAN_REPO_FILE="delorean.repo"
>> > > # openstack overcloud image build --type agent-ramdisk
>> > > # sudo cp ironic-python-agent.initramfs /httpboot/agent.ramdisk
>> > >
>> > > 7) Follow the rest of the documentation to deploy the overcloud
>> > > normally
>> > >
>> > > Please note that obviously your mileage may vary, and this is by
>> > > all
>> > > means not an exclusive list of the problems. I have however used
>> > > these
>> > > steps to do multiple node deployments (10+ nodes) with HA over
>> > > different
>> > > hardware sets with different networking setups (single nic,
>> > > multiple
>> > > nic
>> > > with bonding + vlans).
>> > >
>> > > With all the different repos floating around, all which change
>> > > very
>> > > rapidly, combined with the documentation defaults targeting
>> > > developers
>> > > and CI systems (not end users), it's hard to not only get a
>> > > stable
>> > > TripleO install up, but also communicate and discuss clearly with
>> > > others
>> > > what is working, what is broken, and how to compare two
>> > > installations
>> > > to
>> > > see if they are experiencing the same issues.
>> > >
>> > > To this end I would like to suggest to the RDO and TripleO
>> > > community
>> > > that we undertake the following
>> > >
>> > > 1) Overhaul all the TripleO documentation so that all the steps
>> > > default
>> > > to utilising/deploying using RDO Stable (that is, the releases
>> > > done
>> > > by
>> > > CBS). There should be colored boxes with alt steps for those who
>> > > wish
>> > > to
>> > > use RDO Trunk on the stable branch, and RDO Trunk from master.
>> > > This
>> > > basically inverts the current pattern. I think anyone, Operator
>> > > or
>> > > developer, who is working through the documentation for the first
>> > > time,
>> > > should be given steps that maximise the chance of success, and
>> > > thus
>> > > the
>> > > most stable release we have. Once a user has gone through the
>> > > process
>> > > once, they can look at the alternative steps for more aggressive
>> > > releases
>> > >
>> > > 2) Patch python-tripleoclient so that by default, when you run
>> > > "openstack overcloud image build" it builds the images utilising
>> > > the
>> > > rdo_release DIB element, and sets the RDO_RELEASE environment
>> > > variable
>> > > to be 'mitaka' or whenever the current stable release is (and we
>> > > should
>> > > endevour to update it with new releases). There should be no
>> > > extra
>> > > environment variables necessary to build images, and by default
>> > > it
>> > > should never touch anything RDO Trunk (delorean) related
>> > >
>> > > 3) For bugs like the two I have mentioned above, we need to have
>> > > some
>> > > sort of robust process for either backporting those patches to
>> > > the
>> > > builds in CBS (I understand we don't do this for various
>> > > reasons), or
>> > > we
>> > > need some kind of tooling or solution that allows operators to
>> > > apply
>> > > only the fixes they need from RDO Trunk (delorean). We need to
>> > > ensure
>> > > that when an Operator utilises TripleO they have the greatest
>> > > chance
>> > > of
>> > > success, and bugs such as these which severely impact the
>> > > deployment
>> > > process harm the adoption of TripleO and RDO.
>> > >
>> > > 4) We should curate and keep an up to date page on rdoproject.org
>> > > that
>> > > does highlight the outstanding issues related to TripleO on the
>> > > RDO
>> > > Stable (CBS) releases. These should have links to relevant
>> > > bugzillas,
>> > > clean instructions on how to work around the issue, or cleanly
>> > > apply
>> > > a
>> > > patch to avoid the issue, and as new releases make it out, we
>> > > should
>> > > update the page to drop off workarounds that are no longer
>> > > needed.
>> > >
>> > > The goal is to push Operators/Users to working with our most
>> > > stable
>> > > code
>> > > as much as possible, and track/curate issues around that. This
>> > > way
>> > > everyone should be on the same page, issues are easier to discuss
>> > > and
>> > > diagnose, and overall peoples experiences should be better.
>> > >
>> > > I'm interested in thoughts, feedback, and concerns, both from the
>> > > RDO
>> > > and TripleO community, and from the Operator/User community.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > >
>> > > Graeme
>> > >
>> > > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic-inspector/+bug/1570447
>> > > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322892
>> > >
>> > > On 05/06/16 02:04, Pedro Sousa wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks Marius,
>> > > >
>> > > > I can confirm that it installs fine with 3 controllers + 3
>> > > > computes
>> > > > after recreating the stack
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards
>> > > >
>> > > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Marius Cornea <marius at remote-la
>> > > > b.ne
>> > > > t
>> > > > <mailto:marius at remote-lab.net>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi Pedro,
>> > > >
>> > > > Scaling out controller nodes is not supported at this
>> > > > moment:
>> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243312
>> > > >
>> > > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Pedro Sousa <pgsousa at gmail.
>> > > > com
>> > > > <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > > > > Hi,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > some update on scaling the cloud:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 1 controller + 1 compute -> 1 controller + 3 computes OK
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 1 controller + 3 computes -> 3 controllers + 3 compute
>> > > > FAILS
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Problem: The new controller nodes are "stuck" in "pscd
>> > > > start", so
>> > > > it seems
>> > > > > to be a problem joining the pacemaker cluster... Did
>> > > > anyone
>> > > > had this
>> > > > > problem?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regards
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 1:50 AM, Pedro Sousa <pgsousa at gmai
>> > > > l.co
>> > > > m
>> > > > <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Hi,
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> I finally managed to install a baremetal in mitaka with
>> > > > 1
>> > > > controller + 1
>> > > > >> compute with network isolation. Thank god :)
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> All I did was:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> #yum install centos-release-openstack-mitaka
>> > > > >> #sudo yum install python-tripleoclient
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> without epel repos.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Then followed instructions from Redhat Site.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> I downloaded the overcloud images from:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_i
>> > > > mage
>> > > > s/mitaka/delorean/
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> I do have an issue that forces me to delete a json file
>> > > > and
>> > > > run
>> > > > >> os-refresh-config inside my overcloud nodes other than
>> > > > that
>> > > > it
>> > > > installs
>> > > > >> fine.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Now I'll test with more 2 controllers + 2 computes to
>> > > > have a
>> > > > full HA
>> > > > >> deployment.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> If anyone needs help to document this I'll be happy to
>> > > > help.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Regards,
>> > > > >> Pedro Sousa
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Ronelle Landy <rlandy at re
>> > > > dhat
>> > > > .com
>> > > > <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> The report says: "Fix Released" as of 2016-05-24.
>> > > > >>> Are you installing on a clean system with the latest
>> > > > repositories?
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Might also want to check your version of rabbitmq: I
>> > > > have
>> > > > >>> rabbitmq-server-3.6.2-3.el7.noarch on CentOS 7.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > >>> > From: "Pedro Sousa" <pgsousa at gmail.com <mailto:pgsous
>> > > > a at gm
>> > > > ail.com>>
>> > > > >>> > To: "Ronelle Landy" <rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:rlandy
>> > > > @red
>> > > > hat.com>>
>> > > > >>> > Cc: "Christopher Brown" <cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk
>> > > > <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk>>, "Ignacio Bravo"
>> > > > >>> > <ibravo at ltgfederal.com <mailto:ibravo at ltgfederal.com>
>> > > > >,
>> > > > "rdo-list"
>> > > > >>> > <rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>>
>> > > > >>> > Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 1:20:43 PM
>> > > > >>> > Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Baremetal Tripleo stable
>> > > > version?
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> > Anyway to workaround this? Maybe downgrade hiera?
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Ronelle Landy
>> > > > <rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>>
>> > > > >>> > wrote:
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> > > I am not sure exactly where you installed from, and
>> > > > when you
>> > > > did your
>> > > > >>> > > installation, but any chance, you've hit:
>> > > > >>> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1584892?
>> > > > >>> > > There is a link bugzilla record.
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > >>> > > > From: "Pedro Sousa" <pgsousa at gmail.com
>> > > > <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com>>
>> > > > >>> > > > To: "Ronelle Landy" <rlandy at redhat.com
>> > > > <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>>
>> > > > >>> > > > Cc: "Christopher Brown" <cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk
>> > > > <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk>>, "Ignacio Bravo" <
>> > > > >>> > > ibravo at ltgfederal.com <mailto:ibravo at ltgfederal.com
>> > > > >>,
>> > > > "rdo-list"
>> > > > >>> > > > <rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 12:26:58 PM
>> > > > >>> > > > Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Baremetal Tripleo stable
>> > > > version?
>> > > > >>> > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > Thanks Ronelle,
>> > > > >>> > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > do you think this kind of errors can be related
>> > > > with
>> > > > network
>> > > > >>> > > > settings?
>> > > > >>> > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > "Could not retrieve fact='rabbitmq_nodename',
>> > > > >>> > > > resolution='<anonymous>':
>> > > > >>> > > > undefined method `[]' for nil:NilClass Could not
>> > > > retrieve
>> > > > >>> > > > fact='rabbitmq_nodename',
>> > > > resolution='<anonymous>':
>> > > > undefined
>> > > > >>> > > > method `[]'
>> > > > >>> > > > for nil:NilClass"
>> > > > >>> > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Ronelle Landy
>> > > > <rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>>
>> > > > >>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > Hi Pedro,
>> > > > >>> > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > You could use the docs you referred to.
>> > > > >>> > > > > Alternatively, if you want to use a vm for the
>> > > > undercloud and
>> > > > >>> > > > > baremetal
>> > > > >>> > > > > machines for the overcloud, it is possible to
>> > > > use
>> > > > Tripleo
>> > > > >>> > > > > Qucikstart
>> > > > >>> > > with a
>> > > > >>> > > > > few modifications.
>> > > > >>> > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo-quickstart/+
>> > > > bug/
>> > > > 1571028.
>> > > > >>> > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > >>> > > > > > From: "Pedro Sousa" <pgsousa at gmail.com
>> > > > <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com>>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > To: "Ronelle Landy" <rlandy at redhat.com
>> > > > <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > Cc: "Christopher Brown" <cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk
>> > > > <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk>>, "Ignacio Bravo" <
>> > > > >>> > > > > ibravo at ltgfederal.com <mailto:ibravo at ltgfederal
>> > > > .com
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > ,
>> > > > "rdo-list"
>> > > > >>> > > > > > <rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.
>> > > > com>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 11:48:38 AM
>> > > > >>> > > > > > Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Baremetal Tripleo
>> > > > stable
>> > > > version?
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > Hi Ronelle,
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > maybe I understand it wrong but I thought
>> > > > that
>> > > > Tripleo
>> > > > >>> > > > > > Quickstart
>> > > > >>> > > was for
>> > > > >>> > > > > > deploying virtual environments?
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > And for baremetal we should use
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > >
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tripleo-docs/installati
>> > > > on/i
>> > > > nstallation.html
>> > > > >>> > > > > > ?
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > Thanks
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Ronelle Landy
>> > > > >>> > > > > > <rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > Hello,
>> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > We have had success deploying RDO (Mitaka)
>> > > > on
>> > > > baremetal
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > systems -
>> > > > >>> > > using
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > Tripleo Quickstart with both single-nic-
>> > > > vlans
>> > > > and
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > bond-with-vlans
>> > > > >>> > > > > network
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > isolation configurations.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > Baremetal can have some complicated
>> > > > networking
>> > > > issues but,
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > from
>> > > > >>> > > > > previous
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > experiences, if a single-controller
>> > > > deployment
>> > > > worked but a
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > HA
>> > > > >>> > > > > deployment
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > did not, I would check:
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > - does the HA deployment command include:
>> > > > -e
>> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > >
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-
>> > > > templates/environments/puppet-pacemaker.yaml
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > - are there possible MTU issues?
>> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > From: "Christopher Brown" <cbrown2 at ocf.co
>> > > > .uk
>> > > > <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk>>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > To: pgsousa at gmail.com <mailto:pgsousa at gma
>> > > > il.c
>> > > > om>,
>> > > > ibravo at ltgfederal.com <mailto:ibravo at ltgfederal.com>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > Cc: rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list@
>> > > > redh
>> > > > at.com>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 10:29:39 AM
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Baremetal Tripleo
>> > > > stable
>> > > > version?
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > Hello Ignacio,
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > Thanks for your response and good to know
>> > > > it
>> > > > isn't
>> > > > just me!
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > I would be more than happy to provide
>> > > > developers with
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > access to
>> > > > >>> > > our
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > bare metal environments. I'll also file
>> > > > some
>> > > > bugzilla
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > reports to
>> > > > >>> > > see
>> > > > >>> > > > > if
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > this generates any interest.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > Please do let me know if you make any
>> > > > progress - I am
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > trying to
>> > > > >>> > > > > deploy
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > HA with network isolation, multiple nics
>> > > > and
>> > > > vlans.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > The RDO web page states:
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > "If you want to create a production-ready
>> > > > cloud,
>> > > > you'll
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > want to
>> > > > >>> > > use
>> > > > >>> > > > > the
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > TripleO quickstart guide."
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > which is a contradiction in terms really.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > Cheers
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 14:30 +0100,
>> > > > Ignacio
>> > > > Bravo
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Pedro / Christopher,
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Just wanted to share with you that I
>> > > > also
>> > > > had
>> > > > plenty of
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > issues
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > deploying on bare metal HA servers, and
>> > > > have
>> > > > paused the
>> > > > >>> > > deployment
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > using TripleO until better winds start
>> > > > to
>> > > > flow
>> > > > here. I
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > was
>> > > > >>> > > able to
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > deploy the QuickStart, but on bare
>> > > > metal
>> > > > the
>> > > > history was
>> > > > >>> > > different.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Couldn't even deploy a two server
>> > > > configuration.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > I was thinking that it would be good to
>> > > > have the
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > developers
>> > > > >>> > > have
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > access to one of our environments and
>> > > > go
>> > > > through
>> > > > a full
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > install
>> > > > >>> > > > > with
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > us to better see where things fail. We
>> > > > can
>> > > > do this
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > handholding
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > deployment once every week/month based
>> > > > on
>> > > > developers time
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > availability. That way we can get a
>> > > > working
>> > > > install, and
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > we can
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > troubleshoot real life environment
>> > > > problems.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > IB
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > On Jun 3, 2016, at 6:15 AM, Pedro Sousa
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > <pgsousa at gmail.com <mailto:pgsousa at gmai
>> > > > l.co
>> > > > m>>
>> > > > >>> > > wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > Yes. I've used this, but I'll try
>> > > > again
>> > > > as there's
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > seems to
>> > > > >>> > > be
>> > > > >>> > > > > new
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > updates.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > Stable Branch Skip all repos
>> > > > mentioned
>> > > > above,
>> > > > other
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > than
>> > > > >>> > > epel-
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > release which is still required.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > Enable latest RDO Stable Delorean
>> > > > repository
>> > > > for all
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > packages
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > sudo curl -o
>> > > > /etc/yum.repos.d/delorean-liberty.repo
>> > > > >>> > > > > https://trunk.r
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > doproject.org/centos7-liberty/current/delorean.repo
>> > > > <http://doproject.org/centos7-liberty/current/delorean.repo
>> > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > Enable the Delorean Deps repository
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > sudo curl -o
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > /etc/yum.repos.d/delorean-deps-
>> > > > liberty.repo
>> > > > >>> > > > > http://tru
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > nk.rdoproject.org/centos7-liberty/delorean-deps.repo
>> > > > <http://nk.rdoproject.org/centos7-liberty/delorean-deps.rep
>> > > > o>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:10 AM,
>> > > > Christopher
>> > > > Brown <
>> > > > >>> > > > > cbrown2 at ocf.co <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co>.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > uk> wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > No, Liberty deployed ok for us.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > It suggests to me a package
>> > > > mismatch.
>> > > > Have you
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > completely
>> > > > >>> > > > > rebuilt
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > the
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > undercloud and then the images
>> > > > using
>> > > > Liberty?
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 11:04 +0100,
>> > > > Pedro
>> > > > Sousa wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > AttributeError: 'module' object
>> > > > has
>> > > > no
>> > > > attribute
>> > > > >>> > > 'PortOpt'
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > --
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Christopher Brown
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > OpenStack Engineer
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > OCF plc
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Tel: +44 (0)114 257 2200
>> > > > <tel:%2B44%20%280%29114%20257%202200>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Web: www.ocf.co.uk
>> > > > <http://www.ocf.co.uk>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Blog: blog.ocf.co.uk <http://blog.o
>> > > > cf.c
>> > > > o.uk>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Twitter: @ocfplc
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Please note, any emails relating to
>> > > > an
>> > > > OCF
>> > > > Support
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > request
>> > > > >>> > > must
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > always
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > be sent to support at ocf.co.uk
>> > > > <mailto:support at ocf.co.uk> for a ticket number to
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > be
>> > > > >>> > > > > generated
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > or
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > existing support ticket to be
>> > > > updated.
>> > > > Should this
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > not be
>> > > > >>> > > done
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > then OCF
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > cannot be held responsible for
>> > > > requests
>> > > > not
>> > > > dealt
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > with in a
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > timely
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > manner.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > OCF plc is a company registered in
>> > > > England
>> > > > and Wales.
>> > > > >>> > > > > Registered
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > number
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > 4132533, VAT number GB 780 6803 14.
>> > > > Registered office
>> > > > >>> > > address:
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > OCF plc,
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > 5 Rotunda Business Centre,
>> > > > Thorncliffe
>> > > > Park,
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Chapeltown,
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Sheffield S35
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > 2PG.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > If you have received this message
>> > > > in
>> > > > error,
>> > > > please
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > notify
>> > > > >>> > > us
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > immediately and remove it from your
>> > > > system.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > rdo-list mailing list
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at re
>> > > > dhat
>> > > > .com>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
>> > > > /rdo
>> > > > -list
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at re
>> > > > dhat
>> > > > .com
>> > > > <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > --
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > Regards,
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > Christopher Brown
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > OpenStack Engineer
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > OCF plc
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > Tel: +44 (0)114 257 2200
>> > > > <tel:%2B44%20%280%29114%20257%202200>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > Web: www.ocf.co.uk <http://www.ocf.co.uk>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > Blog: blog.ocf.co.uk <http://blog.ocf.co.
>> > > > uk>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > Twitter: @ocfplc
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > Please note, any emails relating to an
>> > > > OCF
>> > > > Support
>> > > > request
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > must
>> > > > >>> > > > > always
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > be sent to support at ocf.co.uk
>> > > > <mailto:support at ocf.co.uk> for a ticket number to be
>> > > > >>> > > generated or
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > existing support ticket to be updated.
>> > > > Should
>> > > > this
>> > > > not be
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > done
>> > > > >>> > > then
>> > > > >>> > > > > OCF
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > cannot be held responsible for requests
>> > > > not
>> > > > dealt
>> > > > with in a
>> > > > >>> > > timely
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > manner.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > OCF plc is a company registered in
>> > > > England
>> > > > and Wales.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > Registered
>> > > > >>> > > > > number
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > 4132533, VAT number GB 780 6803 14.
>> > > > Registered office
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > address:
>> > > > >>> > > OCF
>> > > > >>> > > > > plc,
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > 5 Rotunda Business Centre, Thorncliffe
>> > > > Park,
>> > > > Chapeltown,
>> > > > >>> > > Sheffield
>> > > > >>> > > > > S35
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > 2PG.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > If you have received this message in
>> > > > error,
>> > > > please
>> > > > notify
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > us
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > immediately and remove it from your
>> > > > system.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > rdo-list mailing list
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redh
>> > > > at.c
>> > > > om>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/r
>> > > > do-l
>> > > > ist
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redh
>> > > > at.c
>> > > > om
>> > > > <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > >
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > rdo-list mailing list
>> > > > > rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>
>> > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>> > > > >
>> > > > > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>> > > > <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > rdo-list mailing list
>> > > > rdo-list at redhat.com
>> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>> > > >
>> > > > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>> > > >
>> > > --
>> > > Graeme Gillies
>> > > Principal Systems Administrator
>> > > Openstack Infrastructure
>> > > Red Hat Australia
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > rdo-list mailing list
>> > > rdo-list at redhat.com
>> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>> > >
>> > > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Christopher Brown
>> > OpenStack Engineer
>> > OCF plc
>> >
>> > Tel: +44 (0)114 257 2200
>> > Web: www.ocf.co.uk
>> > Blog: blog.ocf.co.uk
>> > Twitter: @ocfplc
>> >
>> > Please note, any emails relating to an OCF Support request must
>> > always
>> > be sent to support at ocf.co.uk for a ticket number to be generated or
>> > existing support ticket to be updated. Should this not be done then
>> > OCF
>> >
>> > cannot be held responsible for requests not dealt with in a timely
>> > manner.
>> >
>> > OCF plc is a company registered in England and Wales. Registered
>> > number
>> >
>> > 4132533, VAT number GB 780 6803 14. Registered office address: OCF
>> > plc,
>> >
>> > 5 Rotunda Business Centre, Thorncliffe Park, Chapeltown, Sheffield
>> > S35
>> > 2PG.
>> >
>> > If you have received this message in error, please notify us
>> > immediately and remove it from your system.
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rdo-list mailing list
>> > rdo-list at redhat.com
>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>> >
>> > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
> --
> Regards,
>
> Christopher Brown
> OpenStack Engineer
> OCF plc
>
> Tel: +44 (0)114 257 2200
> Web: www.ocf.co.uk
> Blog: blog.ocf.co.uk
> Twitter: @ocfplc
>
> Please note, any emails relating to an OCF Support request must always
> be sent to support at ocf.co.uk for a ticket number to be generated or
> existing support ticket to be updated. Should this not be done then OCF
>
> cannot be held responsible for requests not dealt with in a timely
> manner.
>
> OCF plc is a company registered in England and Wales. Registered number
>
> 4132533, VAT number GB 780 6803 14. Registered office address: OCF plc,
>
> 5 Rotunda Business Centre, Thorncliffe Park, Chapeltown, Sheffield S35
> 2PG.
>
> If you have received this message in error, please notify us
> immediately and remove it from your system.
More information about the dev
mailing list