[rdo-list] Baremetal Tripleo stable version?
Marius Cornea
marius at remote-lab.net
Mon Jun 6 11:13:40 UTC 2016
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Christopher Brown <cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Graeme,
>
> Thanks for your email which is greatly appreciated.
>
> I am currently rebuilding using your instructions and will update with
> my findings. Once this is done I'll look at starting a basic baremetal
> install guide for the RDO website as one doesn't exist at the moment
> that I can see and I think one of the main "takeaways" from this is
> that stable documentation is needed urgently. I'd be very much inclined
> to keep it separate from the rather confusing developer documentation
> in use currently. This is why people seem to be heading off to Red Hat
> docs I guess.
>
> But I'd be really grateful if the bugs under discussion are addressed
> in Mitaka stable as soon as possible as curling patches is less great.
>
> As an addition, it looks like following discussion with Pedro, the
> overcloud deployment doesn't handle spanning tree on switches correctly
> as we are needing to manually delete json files and re-runs os-apply-
> config when the deployment stalls. This ships by default on switches
> these days so it would be good if the deployment could cater for links
> that aren't immediately in forwarding state.
Could you describe a bit more this issue? It'd would be great if you
have some steps so I can reproduce it. Thanks!
> Happy to help out with documentation and keeping errata/workarounds up
> to date - I think we just need a "stable" section of the website which
> doesn't seem to exist at the moment.
>
> Regards
>
>
> On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 00:37 +0100, Graeme Gillies wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I just wanted to say I have been following this thread quite closely
>> and
>> can sympathize with some of the pain people are going through to get
>> tripleO to work.
>>
>> Currently it's quite difficult and a bit opaque on how to actually
>> utilise the stable mitaka repos in order to build a functional
>> undercloud and overcloud environment.
>>
>> First I wanted to share the steps I have undergone in order to get a
>> functional overcloud working with RDO Mitaka utilising the RDO stable
>> release built by CentOS, and then I'll talk about some specific steps
>> I
>> think need to be undertaken by the RDO/TripleO team in order to
>> provide
>> a better experience in the future.
>>
>> To get a functional overcloud using RDO Mitaka, you need to do the
>> following
>>
>> 1) Install EPEL on your undercloud
>> 2) Install https://www.rdoproject.org/repos/rdo-release.rpm on your
>> undercloud
>> 3) Following the normal steps to install your undercloud (modifying
>> undercloud.conf, and running openstack undercloud install
>> 4) You will now need to manually patch ironic on the undercloud in
>> order
>> to make sure repeated introspection works. This might not be needed
>> if
>> you don't do any introspection, but I find more often than not you
>> end
>> up having to do it, so it's worthwhile. The bug you need to patch is
>> [1]
>> and I typically run the following commands to apply the patch
>>
>> # sudo su -
>> $ cd /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages
>> $ curl
>> 'https://review.openstack.org/changes/306421/revisions/abd50d8438e7d3
>> 71ce24f97d8f8f67052b562007/patch?download'
>> >
>> > base64 -d | patch -p1
>> $ systemctl restart openstack-ironic-inspector
>> $ systemctl restart openstack-ironic-inspector-dnsmasq
>> $ exit
>> #
>>
>> 5) Manually patch the undercloud to build overcloud images using
>> rhos-release rpm only (which utilises the stable Mitaka repo from
>> CentOS, and nothing from RDO Trunk [delorean]). I do this by
>> modifying
>> the file
>>
>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tripleoclient/v1/overcloud_image.py
>>
>> At around line 467 you will see a reference to epel, I add a new line
>> after that to include the rdo_release DIB element to the build as
>> well.
>> This typically makes the file look something like
>>
>> http://paste.openstack.org/show/508196/
>>
>> (note like 468). Then I create a directory to store my images and
>> build
>> them specifying the mitaka version of rdo_release. I then upload
>> these
>> images
>>
>> # mkdir ~/images
>> # cd ~/images
>> # export RDO_RELEASE=mitaka
>> # openstack overcloud image build --all
>> # openstack overcloud image upload --update-existing
>>
>> 6) Because of the bug at [2] which affects the ironic agent ramdisk,
>> we
>> need to build a set of images utilising RDO Trunk for the mitaka
>> branch
>> (where the fix is applied), and then upload *only* the new ironic
>> ramdisk. This is done with
>>
>> # mkdir ~/images-mitaka-trunk
>> # cd ~/images-mitaka-trunk
>> # export USE_DELOREAN_TRUNK=1
>> # export
>> DELOREAN_TRUNK_REPO="http://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-mitaka/curre
>> nt/"
>> # export DELOREAN_REPO_FILE="delorean.repo"
>> # openstack overcloud image build --type agent-ramdisk
>> # sudo cp ironic-python-agent.initramfs /httpboot/agent.ramdisk
>>
>> 7) Follow the rest of the documentation to deploy the overcloud
>> normally
>>
>> Please note that obviously your mileage may vary, and this is by all
>> means not an exclusive list of the problems. I have however used
>> these
>> steps to do multiple node deployments (10+ nodes) with HA over
>> different
>> hardware sets with different networking setups (single nic, multiple
>> nic
>> with bonding + vlans).
>>
>> With all the different repos floating around, all which change very
>> rapidly, combined with the documentation defaults targeting
>> developers
>> and CI systems (not end users), it's hard to not only get a stable
>> TripleO install up, but also communicate and discuss clearly with
>> others
>> what is working, what is broken, and how to compare two installations
>> to
>> see if they are experiencing the same issues.
>>
>> To this end I would like to suggest to the RDO and TripleO community
>> that we undertake the following
>>
>> 1) Overhaul all the TripleO documentation so that all the steps
>> default
>> to utilising/deploying using RDO Stable (that is, the releases done
>> by
>> CBS). There should be colored boxes with alt steps for those who wish
>> to
>> use RDO Trunk on the stable branch, and RDO Trunk from master. This
>> basically inverts the current pattern. I think anyone, Operator or
>> developer, who is working through the documentation for the first
>> time,
>> should be given steps that maximise the chance of success, and thus
>> the
>> most stable release we have. Once a user has gone through the process
>> once, they can look at the alternative steps for more aggressive
>> releases
>>
>> 2) Patch python-tripleoclient so that by default, when you run
>> "openstack overcloud image build" it builds the images utilising the
>> rdo_release DIB element, and sets the RDO_RELEASE environment
>> variable
>> to be 'mitaka' or whenever the current stable release is (and we
>> should
>> endevour to update it with new releases). There should be no extra
>> environment variables necessary to build images, and by default it
>> should never touch anything RDO Trunk (delorean) related
>>
>> 3) For bugs like the two I have mentioned above, we need to have some
>> sort of robust process for either backporting those patches to the
>> builds in CBS (I understand we don't do this for various reasons), or
>> we
>> need some kind of tooling or solution that allows operators to apply
>> only the fixes they need from RDO Trunk (delorean). We need to ensure
>> that when an Operator utilises TripleO they have the greatest chance
>> of
>> success, and bugs such as these which severely impact the deployment
>> process harm the adoption of TripleO and RDO.
>>
>> 4) We should curate and keep an up to date page on rdoproject.org
>> that
>> does highlight the outstanding issues related to TripleO on the RDO
>> Stable (CBS) releases. These should have links to relevant bugzillas,
>> clean instructions on how to work around the issue, or cleanly apply
>> a
>> patch to avoid the issue, and as new releases make it out, we should
>> update the page to drop off workarounds that are no longer needed.
>>
>> The goal is to push Operators/Users to working with our most stable
>> code
>> as much as possible, and track/curate issues around that. This way
>> everyone should be on the same page, issues are easier to discuss and
>> diagnose, and overall peoples experiences should be better.
>>
>> I'm interested in thoughts, feedback, and concerns, both from the RDO
>> and TripleO community, and from the Operator/User community.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Graeme
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic-inspector/+bug/1570447
>> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322892
>>
>> On 05/06/16 02:04, Pedro Sousa wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks Marius,
>> >
>> > I can confirm that it installs fine with 3 controllers + 3 computes
>> > after recreating the stack
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Marius Cornea <marius at remote-lab.ne
>> > t
>> > <mailto:marius at remote-lab.net>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Pedro,
>> >
>> > Scaling out controller nodes is not supported at this moment:
>> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243312
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Pedro Sousa <pgsousa at gmail.com
>> > <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > some update on scaling the cloud:
>> > >
>> > > 1 controller + 1 compute -> 1 controller + 3 computes OK
>> > >
>> > > 1 controller + 3 computes -> 3 controllers + 3 compute FAILS
>> > >
>> > > Problem: The new controller nodes are "stuck" in "pscd
>> > start", so
>> > it seems
>> > > to be a problem joining the pacemaker cluster... Did anyone
>> > had this
>> > > problem?
>> > >
>> > > Regards
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 1:50 AM, Pedro Sousa <pgsousa at gmail.co
>> > m
>> > <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi,
>> > >>
>> > >> I finally managed to install a baremetal in mitaka with 1
>> > controller + 1
>> > >> compute with network isolation. Thank god :)
>> > >>
>> > >> All I did was:
>> > >>
>> > >> #yum install centos-release-openstack-mitaka
>> > >> #sudo yum install python-tripleoclient
>> > >>
>> > >> without epel repos.
>> > >>
>> > >> Then followed instructions from Redhat Site.
>> > >>
>> > >> I downloaded the overcloud images from:
>> > >>
>> > http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_image
>> > s/mitaka/delorean/
>> > >>
>> > >> I do have an issue that forces me to delete a json file and
>> > run
>> > >> os-refresh-config inside my overcloud nodes other than that
>> > it
>> > installs
>> > >> fine.
>> > >>
>> > >> Now I'll test with more 2 controllers + 2 computes to have a
>> > full HA
>> > >> deployment.
>> > >>
>> > >> If anyone needs help to document this I'll be happy to help.
>> > >>
>> > >> Regards,
>> > >> Pedro Sousa
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Ronelle Landy <rlandy at redhat
>> > .com
>> > <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The report says: "Fix Released" as of 2016-05-24.
>> > >>> Are you installing on a clean system with the latest
>> > repositories?
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Might also want to check your version of rabbitmq: I have
>> > >>> rabbitmq-server-3.6.2-3.el7.noarch on CentOS 7.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > >>> > From: "Pedro Sousa" <pgsousa at gmail.com <mailto:pgsousa at gm
>> > ail.com>>
>> > >>> > To: "Ronelle Landy" <rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:rlandy at red
>> > hat.com>>
>> > >>> > Cc: "Christopher Brown" <cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk
>> > <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk>>, "Ignacio Bravo"
>> > >>> > <ibravo at ltgfederal.com <mailto:ibravo at ltgfederal.com>>,
>> > "rdo-list"
>> > >>> > <rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>>
>> > >>> > Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 1:20:43 PM
>> > >>> > Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Baremetal Tripleo stable version?
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > Anyway to workaround this? Maybe downgrade hiera?
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Ronelle Landy
>> > <rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>>
>> > >>> > wrote:
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > > I am not sure exactly where you installed from, and
>> > when you
>> > did your
>> > >>> > > installation, but any chance, you've hit:
>> > >>> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1584892?
>> > >>> > > There is a link bugzilla record.
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > >>> > > > From: "Pedro Sousa" <pgsousa at gmail.com
>> > <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com>>
>> > >>> > > > To: "Ronelle Landy" <rlandy at redhat.com
>> > <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>>
>> > >>> > > > Cc: "Christopher Brown" <cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk
>> > <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk>>, "Ignacio Bravo" <
>> > >>> > > ibravo at ltgfederal.com <mailto:ibravo at ltgfederal.com>>,
>> > "rdo-list"
>> > >>> > > > <rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>>
>> > >>> > > > Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 12:26:58 PM
>> > >>> > > > Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Baremetal Tripleo stable
>> > version?
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Thanks Ronelle,
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > do you think this kind of errors can be related with
>> > network
>> > >>> > > > settings?
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > "Could not retrieve fact='rabbitmq_nodename',
>> > >>> > > > resolution='<anonymous>':
>> > >>> > > > undefined method `[]' for nil:NilClass Could not
>> > retrieve
>> > >>> > > > fact='rabbitmq_nodename', resolution='<anonymous>':
>> > undefined
>> > >>> > > > method `[]'
>> > >>> > > > for nil:NilClass"
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Ronelle Landy
>> > <rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>>
>> > >>> > > > wrote:
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > > Hi Pedro,
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > You could use the docs you referred to.
>> > >>> > > > > Alternatively, if you want to use a vm for the
>> > undercloud and
>> > >>> > > > > baremetal
>> > >>> > > > > machines for the overcloud, it is possible to use
>> > Tripleo
>> > >>> > > > > Qucikstart
>> > >>> > > with a
>> > >>> > > > > few modifications.
>> > >>> > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo-quickstart/+bug/
>> > 1571028.
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > >>> > > > > > From: "Pedro Sousa" <pgsousa at gmail.com
>> > <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com>>
>> > >>> > > > > > To: "Ronelle Landy" <rlandy at redhat.com
>> > <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>>
>> > >>> > > > > > Cc: "Christopher Brown" <cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk
>> > <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk>>, "Ignacio Bravo" <
>> > >>> > > > > ibravo at ltgfederal.com <mailto:ibravo at ltgfederal.com
>> > >>,
>> > "rdo-list"
>> > >>> > > > > > <rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>
>> > >
>> > >>> > > > > > Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 11:48:38 AM
>> > >>> > > > > > Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Baremetal Tripleo stable
>> > version?
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > Hi Ronelle,
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > maybe I understand it wrong but I thought that
>> > Tripleo
>> > >>> > > > > > Quickstart
>> > >>> > > was for
>> > >>> > > > > > deploying virtual environments?
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > And for baremetal we should use
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > >
>> > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tripleo-docs/installation/i
>> > nstallation.html
>> > >>> > > > > > ?
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > Thanks
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Ronelle Landy
>> > >>> > > > > > <rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>>
>> > >>> > > wrote:
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > Hello,
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > We have had success deploying RDO (Mitaka) on
>> > baremetal
>> > >>> > > > > > > systems -
>> > >>> > > using
>> > >>> > > > > > > Tripleo Quickstart with both single-nic-vlans
>> > and
>> > >>> > > > > > > bond-with-vlans
>> > >>> > > > > network
>> > >>> > > > > > > isolation configurations.
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > Baremetal can have some complicated networking
>> > issues but,
>> > >>> > > > > > > from
>> > >>> > > > > previous
>> > >>> > > > > > > experiences, if a single-controller deployment
>> > worked but a
>> > >>> > > > > > > HA
>> > >>> > > > > deployment
>> > >>> > > > > > > did not, I would check:
>> > >>> > > > > > > - does the HA deployment command include: -e
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > >
>> > /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-
>> > templates/environments/puppet-pacemaker.yaml
>> > >>> > > > > > > - are there possible MTU issues?
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > >>> > > > > > > > From: "Christopher Brown" <cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk
>> > <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk>>
>> > >>> > > > > > > > To: pgsousa at gmail.com <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.c
>> > om>,
>> > ibravo at ltgfederal.com <mailto:ibravo at ltgfederal.com>
>> > >>> > > > > > > > Cc: rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redh
>> > at.com>
>> > >>> > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 10:29:39 AM
>> > >>> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Baremetal Tripleo
>> > stable
>> > version?
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > Hello Ignacio,
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > Thanks for your response and good to know it
>> > isn't
>> > just me!
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > I would be more than happy to provide
>> > developers with
>> > >>> > > > > > > > access to
>> > >>> > > our
>> > >>> > > > > > > > bare metal environments. I'll also file some
>> > bugzilla
>> > >>> > > > > > > > reports to
>> > >>> > > see
>> > >>> > > > > if
>> > >>> > > > > > > > this generates any interest.
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > Please do let me know if you make any
>> > progress - I am
>> > >>> > > > > > > > trying to
>> > >>> > > > > deploy
>> > >>> > > > > > > > HA with network isolation, multiple nics and
>> > vlans.
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > The RDO web page states:
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > "If you want to create a production-ready
>> > cloud,
>> > you'll
>> > >>> > > > > > > > want to
>> > >>> > > use
>> > >>> > > > > the
>> > >>> > > > > > > > TripleO quickstart guide."
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > which is a contradiction in terms really.
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > Cheers
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 14:30 +0100, Ignacio
>> > Bravo
>> > wrote:
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > Pedro / Christopher,
>> > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > Just wanted to share with you that I also
>> > had
>> > plenty of
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > issues
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > deploying on bare metal HA servers, and
>> > have
>> > paused the
>> > >>> > > deployment
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > using TripleO until better winds start to
>> > flow
>> > here. I
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > was
>> > >>> > > able to
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > deploy the QuickStart, but on bare metal
>> > the
>> > history was
>> > >>> > > different.
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > Couldn't even deploy a two server
>> > configuration.
>> > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > I was thinking that it would be good to
>> > have the
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > developers
>> > >>> > > have
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > access to one of our environments and go
>> > through
>> > a full
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > install
>> > >>> > > > > with
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > us to better see where things fail. We can
>> > do this
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > handholding
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > deployment once every week/month based on
>> > developers time
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > availability. That way we can get a working
>> > install, and
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > we can
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > troubleshoot real life environment
>> > problems.
>> > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > IB
>> > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > On Jun 3, 2016, at 6:15 AM, Pedro Sousa
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > <pgsousa at gmail.com <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.co
>> > m>>
>> > >>> > > wrote:
>> > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > Yes. I've used this, but I'll try again
>> > as there's
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > seems to
>> > >>> > > be
>> > >>> > > > > new
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > updates.
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > Stable Branch Skip all repos mentioned
>> > above,
>> > other
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > than
>> > >>> > > epel-
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > release which is still required.
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > Enable latest RDO Stable Delorean
>> > repository
>> > for all
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > packages
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > sudo curl -o
>> > /etc/yum.repos.d/delorean-liberty.repo
>> > >>> > > > > https://trunk.r
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > doproject.org/centos7-liberty/current/delorean.repo
>> > <http://doproject.org/centos7-liberty/current/delorean.repo>
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > Enable the Delorean Deps repository
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > sudo curl -o
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > /etc/yum.repos.d/delorean-deps-
>> > liberty.repo
>> > >>> > > > > http://tru
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > nk.rdoproject.org/centos7-liberty/delorean-deps.repo
>> > <http://nk.rdoproject.org/centos7-liberty/delorean-deps.repo>
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:10 AM,
>> > Christopher
>> > Brown <
>> > >>> > > > > cbrown2 at ocf.co <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co>.
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > uk> wrote:
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > No, Liberty deployed ok for us.
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > It suggests to me a package mismatch.
>> > Have you
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > completely
>> > >>> > > > > rebuilt
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > the
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > undercloud and then the images using
>> > Liberty?
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 11:04 +0100,
>> > Pedro
>> > Sousa wrote:
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > AttributeError: 'module' object has
>> > no
>> > attribute
>> > >>> > > 'PortOpt'
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > --
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Christopher Brown
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > OpenStack Engineer
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > OCF plc
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Tel: +44 (0)114 257 2200
>> > <tel:%2B44%20%280%29114%20257%202200>
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Web: www.ocf.co.uk
>> > <http://www.ocf.co.uk>
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Blog: blog.ocf.co.uk <http://blog.ocf.c
>> > o.uk>
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Twitter: @ocfplc
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Please note, any emails relating to an
>> > OCF
>> > Support
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > request
>> > >>> > > must
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > always
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > be sent to support at ocf.co.uk
>> > <mailto:support at ocf.co.uk> for a ticket number to
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > be
>> > >>> > > > > generated
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > or
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > existing support ticket to be updated.
>> > Should this
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > not be
>> > >>> > > done
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > then OCF
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > cannot be held responsible for requests
>> > not
>> > dealt
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > with in a
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > timely
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > manner.
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > OCF plc is a company registered in
>> > England
>> > and Wales.
>> > >>> > > > > Registered
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > number
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > 4132533, VAT number GB 780 6803 14.
>> > Registered office
>> > >>> > > address:
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > OCF plc,
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > 5 Rotunda Business Centre, Thorncliffe
>> > Park,
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Chapeltown,
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Sheffield S35
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > 2PG.
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > If you have received this message in
>> > error,
>> > please
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > notify
>> > >>> > > us
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > immediately and remove it from your
>> > system.
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > rdo-list mailing list
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat
>> > .com>
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo
>> > -list
>> > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat
>> > .com
>> > <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com>
>> > >>> > > > > > > > --
>> > >>> > > > > > > > Regards,
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > Christopher Brown
>> > >>> > > > > > > > OpenStack Engineer
>> > >>> > > > > > > > OCF plc
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > Tel: +44 (0)114 257 2200
>> > <tel:%2B44%20%280%29114%20257%202200>
>> > >>> > > > > > > > Web: www.ocf.co.uk <http://www.ocf.co.uk>
>> > >>> > > > > > > > Blog: blog.ocf.co.uk <http://blog.ocf.co.uk>
>> > >>> > > > > > > > Twitter: @ocfplc
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > Please note, any emails relating to an OCF
>> > Support
>> > request
>> > >>> > > > > > > > must
>> > >>> > > > > always
>> > >>> > > > > > > > be sent to support at ocf.co.uk
>> > <mailto:support at ocf.co.uk> for a ticket number to be
>> > >>> > > generated or
>> > >>> > > > > > > > existing support ticket to be updated. Should
>> > this
>> > not be
>> > >>> > > > > > > > done
>> > >>> > > then
>> > >>> > > > > OCF
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > cannot be held responsible for requests not
>> > dealt
>> > with in a
>> > >>> > > timely
>> > >>> > > > > > > > manner.
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > OCF plc is a company registered in England
>> > and Wales.
>> > >>> > > > > > > > Registered
>> > >>> > > > > number
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > 4132533, VAT number GB 780 6803 14.
>> > Registered office
>> > >>> > > > > > > > address:
>> > >>> > > OCF
>> > >>> > > > > plc,
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > 5 Rotunda Business Centre, Thorncliffe Park,
>> > Chapeltown,
>> > >>> > > Sheffield
>> > >>> > > > > S35
>> > >>> > > > > > > > 2PG.
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > If you have received this message in error,
>> > please
>> > notify
>> > >>> > > > > > > > us
>> > >>> > > > > > > > immediately and remove it from your system.
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > >>> > > > > > > > rdo-list mailing list
>> > >>> > > > > > > > rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.c
>> > om>
>> > >>> > > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-l
>> > ist
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.c
>> > om
>> > <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com>
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > rdo-list mailing list
>> > > rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>
>> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>> > >
>> > > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>> > <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rdo-list mailing list
>> > rdo-list at redhat.com
>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>> >
>> > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Graeme Gillies
>> Principal Systems Administrator
>> Openstack Infrastructure
>> Red Hat Australia
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rdo-list mailing list
>> rdo-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>
>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
> --
> Regards,
>
> Christopher Brown
> OpenStack Engineer
> OCF plc
>
> Tel: +44 (0)114 257 2200
> Web: www.ocf.co.uk
> Blog: blog.ocf.co.uk
> Twitter: @ocfplc
>
> Please note, any emails relating to an OCF Support request must always
> be sent to support at ocf.co.uk for a ticket number to be generated or
> existing support ticket to be updated. Should this not be done then OCF
>
> cannot be held responsible for requests not dealt with in a timely
> manner.
>
> OCF plc is a company registered in England and Wales. Registered number
>
> 4132533, VAT number GB 780 6803 14. Registered office address: OCF plc,
>
> 5 Rotunda Business Centre, Thorncliffe Park, Chapeltown, Sheffield S35
> 2PG.
>
> If you have received this message in error, please notify us
> immediately and remove it from your system.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rdo-list mailing list
> rdo-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>
> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
More information about the dev
mailing list