[rdo-list] TripleO UI Packaging Strategy

[Haïkel]

2016-07-26 15:09 GMT+02:00 Hugh Brock <hbrock at redhat.com>:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Haïkel <hguemar at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> 2016-07-26 12:33 GMT+02:00 Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com>:
>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Honza Pokorny <honza at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2016-07-25 16:23, Haïkel wrote:
>>>>> 2016-07-25 16:17 GMT+02:00 Honza Pokorny <honza at redhat.com>:
>>>>> > On 2016-07-23 04:26, Haďkel wrote:
>>>>> >> @Jason: As I said during the mentioned call, we have nodejs 0.10.36
>>>>> >> build in CBS -I'm actually the one who built it- and there's no
>>>>> >> problem in importing a LTS release (4.x or 6.x)
>>>>> >> Mattias is of the opinion we should stick to 4.x which is the current LTS.
>>>>> >> http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=8185
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> I'm taking the action of importing a newer nodejs build in our
>>>>> >> repository. Jakub and I will be providing support in
>>>>> >> packaging/reviewing tripleo-ui.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I'm confident we can make this happen early this week, thanks to Haikel
>>>>> > and Jakup.  As Jason said, if we can get some eyes on the infra patch
>>>>> > and the packaging patch that would certainly speed things up.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Haikel, if you could have a quick look at the spec file for tripleo-ui,
>>>>> > I think that would make a nice starting point.  Or, would you rather I
>>>>> > submitted a format request for review to RDO at this point?
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> Both works for me.
>>>>
>>>> RDO review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359950
>>>>
>>>> Gerrit patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/344932/
>>>
>>> Thanks, Honza.
>>>
>>> Just looking through the node_modules tarball very briefly, I think
>>> it's going to take quite a bit of review to satisfy ourselves that
>>> everything is really built from source in the build system, and that
>>> we will actually be able to %patch the source for anything shipped in
>>> the final RPM or anything used to build an artifact in the final RPM.
>>>
>>> For a start, I suggest deleting phantomjs-prebuilt and see what
>>> happens. It contains an ELF executable.
>>>
>
> Thanks for your help on this, Haikel.
>
>> This is the only ELF binary, and it's only required for running tests,
>> so we can drop it.
>> Another good reason is that rebuilding recent webkit on EL7 would take
>> some time.
>
> Very good.
>
>> node_modules.tar.gz should be in a separate tarballs, in order for us
>> to include tripleo-ui in DLRN.
>>
>>
>> Many libs are generated from coffeescript (800 exactly), some libs are
>> duplicated (e.g lodash, source-map, express, base64 etc.) but fighting
>> duplication will be a never-ending task with node apps.
>
> Yay...
>
>> First licensing checks:
>> * React.js: should be ok but patents grant is still debated among legal
>
> How big a problem is this? Do I need to panic and call rfontana?
>

Well, according to him safe to ship, I already followed up to dbecker
and the other folks.
It boils down to some techn

>> * known licenses: MIT, BSD 2 and 3 clauses, ISC, WTFPL 2.0, ASL 2.0,
>> MPL 2.0 (w/ BSD 3 clauses which saves the hassle to figure out
>> compatibility w/ GPL)
>
> Good, I think...
>
>> * unknown licenses: mostly generated files from coffeescript.
>
> Is this safe, then?
>

I think so, but looking at these more carefully, I need to check both
toolchain and original sources.

H.


> Thanks,
> --H
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> H.
>>
>>> Another minor observation - the tarball published by upstream should
>>> have a tripleo-ui-$version base directory.
>>>
>>> Mark.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> >> Considering we'll be having many missing people due to summer
>>>>> >> vacations, I associated Jakub to avoid being the SPOF in that process.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> As we want to have this sorted out before M3, I'd like to have status
>>>>> >> during our weekly RDO meetings to follow up progress and solve
>>>>> >> impediments.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Regards,
>>>>> >> H.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rdo-list mailing list
>>>> rdo-list at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rdo-list mailing list
>> rdo-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>
>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>
>
>
> --
>   ,       ,    | Hugh Brock, hbrock at redhat.com
>   )-_"""_-(    | Director of Engineering, OpenStack Management
>  ./ o\ /o \.   | TripleO: Install, configure, and scale OpenStack.
> . \__/ \__/ .  | http://rdoproject.org, http://tripleo.org
> ...   V   ...  |
> ... - - - ...  | "I know that you believe you understand what you
>  .   - -   .   | think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what
>   `-.....-´    | you heard is not what I meant." --Robert McCloskey
>  "TripleOwl"