[rdo-list] rdo-list Digest, Vol 45, Issue 7

Phill. Whiteside phillwuk at gmail.com
Fri Dec 9 16:37:50 UTC 2016


Re: Packstack

My heart sank when I read someone post up that packstack was abandon-ware.
I'm so very glad that this does not appear to be the case. I am considering
switching my newer machine to be a test machine and using the lower spec
one for daily use. The older one has 4GB RAM, so just scrapes in, the newer
one does have 8GB and also usb3 to play with adding on Cinder or just an
extra resource to Nova.

Kindest regards,

Phill.

On 8 December 2016 at 22:27, <rdo-list-owner at redhat.com> wrote:

> You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message has
> been automatically rejected.  If you think that your messages are
> being rejected in error, contact the mailing list owner at
> rdo-list-owner at redhat.com.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Phill. Whiteside" <phillwuk at gmail.com>
> To: rdo-list at redhat.com
> Cc:
> Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 22:27:13 +0000
> Subject: Re: rdo-list Digest, Vol 45, Issue 7
> Re: Packstack
>
> My heart sank when I read someone post up that packstack was abandon-ware.
> I'm so very glad that this does not appear to be the case. I am considering
> switching my newer machine to be a test machine and using the lower spec
> one for daily use. The older one has 4GB RAM, so just scrapes in, the newer
> one does have 8GB and also usb3 to play with adding on Cinder or just an
> extra resource to Nova.
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Phill.
>
> On 8 December 2016 at 17:00, <rdo-list-request at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Send rdo-list mailing list submissions to
>>         rdo-list at redhat.com
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>         https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>         rdo-list-request at redhat.com
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>         rdo-list-owner at redhat.com
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of rdo-list digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>    1. Re: What's in RDO/Packstack/TripleO matrix (Rich Bowen)
>>    2. Reminder: Red Hat Summit call for papers closes December  16th
>>       (Rich Bowen)
>>    3. Re: What's in RDO/Packstack/TripleO matrix (Outback Dingo)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 11:00:56 -0500
>> From: Rich Bowen <rbowen at redhat.com>
>> To: Udi Kalifon <ukalifon at redhat.com>
>> Cc: "rdo-list at redhat.com" <rdo-list at redhat.com>
>> Subject: Re: [rdo-list] What's in RDO/Packstack/TripleO matrix
>> Message-ID: <cbd4d512-426d-767b-05d6-80670df5135b at redhat.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/08/2016 03:15 AM, Udi Kalifon wrote:
>> > Packstack and TripleO are both openstack installers, but RDO is not an
>> > installer so you can't compare it with them. Besides, packstack should
>> > be officially dead. If you still want to compare the capabilities of the
>> > installers you should probably not compare packages, but features such
>> > as HA, SSL, IPv6, upgrade support, scaling, customization and more and
>> > more and more... The list will be endless.
>>
>> "in RDO" means "is packaged and available in RDO repos". Whereas for
>> Packstack and TripleO, it's about whether these things deploy them. This
>> is a common question, and so one that needs some kind of answer. The
>> terminology "in" may be misleading. I welcome suggestions.
>>
>> And Packstack is most definitely not dead. :-)
>>
>> --Rich
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Udi Kalifon; Senior QE; RHOS-UIAutomation
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Rich Bowen <rbowen at redhat.com
>> > <mailto:rbowen at redhat.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     As discussed in last week's RDO meeting, I've started a matrix of
>> what's
>> >     in RDO, Packstack, and TripleO, since this is a common area of
>> >     confusion, as illustrated by some of the survey results.
>> >
>> >     The first draft of this is at https://www.rdoproject.org/rdo
>> /matrix/
>> >     <https://www.rdoproject.org/rdo/matrix/> and
>> >     I'm reasonably sure that it's incomplete and possibly inaccurate.
>> It's
>> >     based on
>> >     https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/blob/master/rdo.yml
>> >     <https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/blob/master/rdo.yml>
>> >     as a starting point.
>> >
>> >     I was hoping that some people might have a look at it, correct what
>> I
>> >     have, and fill in the Packstack and TripleO portions.
>> >
>> >     At the moment, it's just binary - is this package in this
>> collection.
>> >     But there's plenty of room there for more information, such as what
>> >     version(s) it is available in, and URLs for more information.
>> >
>> >     Thanks.
>> >
>> >     --
>> >     Rich Bowen - rbowen at redhat.com <mailto:rbowen at redhat.com>
>> >     RDO Community Liaison
>> >     http://rdoproject.org
>> >     @RDOCommunity
>> >
>> >     _______________________________________________
>> >     rdo-list mailing list
>> >     rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>
>> >     https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>> >     <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list>
>> >
>> >     To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>> >     <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Rich Bowen - rbowen at redhat.com
>> RDO Community Liaison
>> http://rdoproject.org
>> @RDOCommunity
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 11:10:05 -0500
>> From: Rich Bowen <rbowen at redhat.com>
>> To: "rdo-list at redhat.com" <rdo-list at redhat.com>
>> Subject: [rdo-list] Reminder: Red Hat Summit call for papers closes
>>         December        16th
>> Message-ID: <ff0ea771-bf9a-fbe4-26a1-a17428b6a411 at redhat.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>>
>> As in the subject, Red Hat Summit call for papers closes December 16th.
>> I'm not seeing very many RDO/OpenStack/NFV/etc talks as I am reviewing
>> submissions, so it's time to get those in!
>>
>> https://rh2017.smarteventscloud.com/portal/cfp/
>>
>>
>> --Rich
>>
>> --
>> Rich Bowen - rbowen at redhat.com
>> RDO Community Liaison
>> http://rdoproject.org
>> @RDOCommunity
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 11:11:44 -0500
>> From: Outback Dingo <outbackdingo at gmail.com>
>> To: Rich Bowen <rbowen at redhat.com>
>> Cc: "rdo-list at redhat.com" <rdo-list at redhat.com>
>> Subject: Re: [rdo-list] What's in RDO/Packstack/TripleO matrix
>> Message-ID:
>>         <CAKYr3zyYC37XYNrsdkU1Z+gJhCS5VKyV0x-W-K1320QgoZF6UA at mail.
>> gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Rich Bowen <rbowen at redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 12/08/2016 03:15 AM, Udi Kalifon wrote:
>> >> Packstack and TripleO are both openstack installers, but RDO is not an
>> >> installer so you can't compare it with them. Besides, packstack should
>> >> be officially dead. If you still want to compare the capabilities of
>> the
>> >> installers you should probably not compare packages, but features such
>> >> as HA, SSL, IPv6, upgrade support, scaling, customization and more and
>> >> more and more... The list will be endless.
>> >
>> > "in RDO" means "is packaged and available in RDO repos". Whereas for
>> > Packstack and TripleO, it's about whether these things deploy them. This
>> > is a common question, and so one that needs some kind of answer. The
>> > terminology "in" may be misleading. I welcome suggestions.
>> >
>> > And Packstack is most definitely not dead. :-)
>> >
>> > --Rich
>> >
>>
>> and RDO Packstack allows those of us to deploy a working system when
>> we dont buy into this triple-0 BS ..... I dont need it.
>>
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Udi Kalifon; Senior QE; RHOS-UIAutomation
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Rich Bowen <rbowen at redhat.com
>> >> <mailto:rbowen at redhat.com>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>     As discussed in last week's RDO meeting, I've started a matrix of
>> what's
>> >>     in RDO, Packstack, and TripleO, since this is a common area of
>> >>     confusion, as illustrated by some of the survey results.
>> >>
>> >>     The first draft of this is at https://www.rdoproject.org/rdo
>> /matrix/
>> >>     <https://www.rdoproject.org/rdo/matrix/> and
>> >>     I'm reasonably sure that it's incomplete and possibly inaccurate.
>> It's
>> >>     based on
>> >>     https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/blob/master/rdo.yml
>> >>     <https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/blob/master/rdo.yml>
>> >>     as a starting point.
>> >>
>> >>     I was hoping that some people might have a look at it, correct
>> what I
>> >>     have, and fill in the Packstack and TripleO portions.
>> >>
>> >>     At the moment, it's just binary - is this package in this
>> collection.
>> >>     But there's plenty of room there for more information, such as what
>> >>     version(s) it is available in, and URLs for more information.
>> >>
>> >>     Thanks.
>> >>
>> >>     --
>> >>     Rich Bowen - rbowen at redhat.com <mailto:rbowen at redhat.com>
>> >>     RDO Community Liaison
>> >>     http://rdoproject.org
>> >>     @RDOCommunity
>> >>
>> >>     _______________________________________________
>> >>     rdo-list mailing list
>> >>     rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>
>> >>     https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>> >>     <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list>
>> >>
>> >>     To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>> >>     <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > Rich Bowen - rbowen at redhat.com
>> > RDO Community Liaison
>> > http://rdoproject.org
>> > @RDOCommunity
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rdo-list mailing list
>> > rdo-list at redhat.com
>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>> >
>> > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rdo-list mailing list
>> rdo-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>
>>
>> End of rdo-list Digest, Vol 45, Issue 7
>> ***************************************
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rdoproject.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20161209/1f93bd44/attachment.html>


More information about the dev mailing list