[Rdo-list] RDO-Manager Build Plans and building Operational Toolchain for RDO

[Graeme Gillies]

On 06/11/2015 01:36 PM, Haïkel wrote:
> 2015-06-11 2:11 GMT+02:00 Graeme Gillies <ggillies at redhat.com>:
>>
>> Sure the list (with the exception of elasticsearch) is at
>>
>> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/230935/98121514/
>>
> 
> Thanks
> 
>> I've tried to follow the fedora packaging guidelines as much as possible
>> (there were only draft guidelines for golang packages) so that's why
>> there are so many of them.
>>
> 
> You did it right.
> 
>> So would the best way forward be for me to get all these packages in
>> Fedora first? My understanding was with RDO we were moving away from
>> packaging Openstack itself in fedora (instead keep the fedora packages
>> in RDO), would we treat these packages the same way? Or just put them
>> through Fedora, then bring them into RDO for Centos/EL only?
>>
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Until we have a better alternative for packaging review, we still need
> to push them in
> Fedora. Moreover, it actually makes sense for operational tools to
> have them in Fedora.
> 
> When they're imported, we'll just rebuild them in CBS.

Ok makes sense

> 
>>
>> Unfortunately yeah timing wasn't good for me to attend the meeting, but
>> I'll try and attend the next one. Just to clarify, the first step at
>> this stage is for me to get all packages above through the fedora
>> package review process? I am ok to do that, just with ~140 odd packages
>> it's going to take a while :/
>>
> 
> That's unfortunate, but we'll find more convenient ways to sync up with you :)
> 
> Since this is a very large list of packages, I suggest that we just do
> a first round of mass
> review and fix what needs to be fixed first rather than wasting time
> ticket per ticket.
> After that, we'll submit them for review and get them approved rather quickly.

Ok cool

> 
> If you could push spec+srpm somewhere, I'll try to free myself some
> time during the two next weeks
> and batch review them. I'll also try to sort out packages that
> requires deeper reviews, and the ones
> that could be approved in one go after fixing.
> As we need two people for a review, we could split the list and
> alternate between the reviewee/reviewer
> role.

Cool I've pushed essentially the contents from dist git (with the
exception of sources) to

https://github.com/ggillies/optools-fedora-rpms

Is this ok? Is there anything else you would like me to add to that repo?

Thanks again for the help,

Regards,

Graeme

> 
> Regards,
> H.
> 
> 
>> Regards,
>>
>> Graeme
>>
>>>
>>> H.
>>>
>>>> Any suggestions or advice would be very much appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Graeme
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Graeme Gillies
>>>> Principal Systems Administrator
>>>> Openstack Infrastructure
>>>> Red Hat Australia
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Rdo-list mailing list
>>>> Rdo-list at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
>>
>>
>> --
>> Graeme Gillies
>> Principal Systems Administrator
>> Openstack Infrastructure
>> Red Hat Australia


-- 
Graeme Gillies
Principal Systems Administrator
Openstack Infrastructure
Red Hat Australia