[Rdo-list] Notes from test days

[Arash Kaffamanesh]

Sorry Rich, I posted the my previous email inadvertently only to you.

The answer to my own question regarding vxlan support for Juno is:
Yes, it works like a charm, what I was missing was the proper network
configuration for ovs and the br-ex interface on CentOS 7 and some
additional steps by creating the networks after deployment and the right
settings in the answer-file
I'll write a step by step how to for ML2 VXLAN OpenStack Juno deployment
with Packstack and post the link on this list in few hours.

Thanks!
- Arash




On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Arash Kaffamanesh <ak at cloudssky.com> wrote:

> Hi Rich,
> hello together,
>
> Many thanks to you and all of you for your effort testing the Juno release.
>
> I'm trying to get a 2 node RDO Juno installation working with
> Packstack  (1 controller and 1 compute, each with 2 nics on CentOS 7) and
> it seems that the vxlan is the default networking mode now. But after the
> initial installation and creating a tenant, user and networks (internal and
> external) and spawning instances, the instances show up in the console
> properly, and I can associate floating IPs to the instances, but I can't
> ping or ssh into them.
>
> On CentOS 7, the reason for me seems to be openvswitch related and if I
> try to create the ifcfg-br-ex bridge by hand and plug the external
> interface vis ovs into it, then I'm not able to login to the controller
> host.
>
> So my question is, does vxlan work on Juno at this time at all :-)
> And if yes, could someone provide any hint about how to create the br-ex
> and create the interfaces properly on CentOS 7 for this 2 node installation?
>
> Thanks!
> Arash
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Rich Bowen <rbowen at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> The raw IRC transcripts from the RDO test day are available at
>> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/rdo/2014-09-30/
>>
>> Of particular interest, probably are the links that are enumerated in
>> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/rdo/2014-09-30/rdo.2014-09-30-20.59.html
>> which show many of the bugs that were encountered or opened during the
>> course of testing.
>>
>> There's also some listed on https://openstack.redhat.com/
>> RDO_test_day_Juno_milestone_3_test_cases
>>
>> Thank you all so much for participating in testing, and helping find
>> these things. Thanks also for the people that answered questions all day
>> long on IRC and on this mailing list. You're making OpenStack better.
>>
>> If you participated in testing, and haven't shared your notes or results,
>> please take a moment today to do that, while the memory is fresh. You can
>> write these up anywhere - please link to them from the Test Cases, and
>> please open tickets if you encountered problems. It's always better to open
>> a ticket, if you're not sure if the issue has been raised before. Start
>> here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=RDO
>>
>> Finally, a reminder that, although test day is over, you're always
>> encouraged to test the latest builds, and report your findings here - on
>> this list - and on IRC, so that together we can continue to make OpenStack
>> better.
>>
>> * Test day details - https://openstack.redhat.com/
>> RDO_test_day_Juno_milestone_3
>> * Tests and results - https://openstack.redhat.com/
>> RDO_test_day_Juno_milestone_3_test_cases
>>
>> --
>> Rich Bowen - rbowen at redhat.com
>> OpenStack Community Liaison
>> http://openstack.redhat.com/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rdo-list mailing list
>> Rdo-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rdoproject.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20141005/76dcbfe2/attachment.html>