[Rdo-list] Packstack Icehouse changes

[Madko]

just installed the centos-SCL repo and now the installation is fine. Thanks
:)


2014-06-27 9:41 GMT+02:00 JuanFra Rodriguez Cardoso <
juanfra.rodriguez.cardoso at gmail.com>:

> Have you installed centos-SCL repo?
>
> Regards,
> ---
> JuanFra Rodriguez Cardoso
>
>
> 2014-06-27 9:30 GMT+02:00 Madko <madko77 at gmail.com>:
>
> No more luck :(
>> I can't even install foreman due to this bug =>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091564
>> any idea how to make it work?
>>
>>
>> 2014-06-26 18:03 GMT+02:00 Kun Huang <gareth at openstacker.org>:
>>
>>> btw, the lastest reference should be this one?
>>>
>>>
>>> https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_OpenStack_Platform/5/html/Installation_and_Configuration_Guide/part-Deploy_OpenStack_with_Foreman.html
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Madko <madko77 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Thanks, I will give it a try. I hope with more luck than packstack.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2014-06-26 16:59 GMT+02:00 JuanFra Rodriguez Cardoso
>>> > <juanfra.rodriguez.cardoso at gmail.com>:
>>> >
>>> >> Foreman is the right tool! ;)
>>> >> Red Hat has great docs about it:
>>> >>
>>> https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_OpenStack_Platform/4/html/Installation_and_Configuration_Guide/part-Deploying_OpenStack_with_Foreman.html
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards
>>> >> ---
>>> >> JuanFra Rodriguez Cardoso
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> 2014-06-26 16:52 GMT+02:00 Madko <madko77 at gmail.com>:
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 2014-06-26 16:44 GMT+02:00 Jakub Ruzicka <jruzicka at redhat.com>:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> On 26.6.2014 15:33, Perry Myers wrote:
>>> >>>> > On 06/26/2014 09:23 AM, Shake Chen wrote:
>>> >>>> >> remove the feature the packstack have been own is not good idea,
>>> and
>>> >>>> >> would affect many user.
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > Part of the reason for the reduction in scope of Packstack is due
>>> to
>>> >>>> > resource constraints for the team that is working on Packstack,
>>> Puppet
>>> >>>> > and Foreman.
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > If we could get some folks outside of Red Hat to become upstream
>>> >>>> > contributors and more importantly maintainers of Packstack, then
>>> that
>>> >>>> > would alleviate some of the scope creep concerns and perhaps
>>> Packstack
>>> >>>> > could be expanded a bit.
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > But right now with the majority of the effort solely coming from a
>>> >>>> > handful of Red Hatters, we just don't have the bandwidth and
>>> hence the
>>> >>>> > scope of Packstack was reduced to be purely an all-in-one/demo
>>> tool.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Well, it was created as a proof-of-concept/demo tool in the first
>>> place.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> If you want sophisticated multi-node installer, packstack isn't the
>>> >>>> right tool for that job.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Good to know, what is the right tool for that job?  I mean multi-node
>>> >>> installer.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Cheers
>>> >>>> Jakub
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> Rdo-list mailing list
>>> >>>> Rdo-list at redhat.com
>>> >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Best regards,
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Edouard Bourguignon
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> Rdo-list mailing list
>>> >>> Rdo-list at redhat.com
>>> >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Edouard Bourguignon
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Rdo-list mailing list
>>> > Rdo-list at redhat.com
>>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Edouard Bourguignon
>>
>
>


-- 
Edouard Bourguignon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rdoproject.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20140627/bf2fa2dd/attachment.html>