[Rdo-list] Packstack Icehouse changes

[Madko]

No more luck :(
I can't even install foreman due to this bug =>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091564
any idea how to make it work?


2014-06-26 18:03 GMT+02:00 Kun Huang <gareth at openstacker.org>:

> btw, the lastest reference should be this one?
>
>
> https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_OpenStack_Platform/5/html/Installation_and_Configuration_Guide/part-Deploy_OpenStack_with_Foreman.html
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Madko <madko77 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks, I will give it a try. I hope with more luck than packstack.
> >
> >
> > 2014-06-26 16:59 GMT+02:00 JuanFra Rodriguez Cardoso
> > <juanfra.rodriguez.cardoso at gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Foreman is the right tool! ;)
> >> Red Hat has great docs about it:
> >>
> https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_OpenStack_Platform/4/html/Installation_and_Configuration_Guide/part-Deploying_OpenStack_with_Foreman.html
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> ---
> >> JuanFra Rodriguez Cardoso
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-06-26 16:52 GMT+02:00 Madko <madko77 at gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2014-06-26 16:44 GMT+02:00 Jakub Ruzicka <jruzicka at redhat.com>:
> >>>
> >>>> On 26.6.2014 15:33, Perry Myers wrote:
> >>>> > On 06/26/2014 09:23 AM, Shake Chen wrote:
> >>>> >> remove the feature the packstack have been own is not good idea,
> and
> >>>> >> would affect many user.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Part of the reason for the reduction in scope of Packstack is due to
> >>>> > resource constraints for the team that is working on Packstack,
> Puppet
> >>>> > and Foreman.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > If we could get some folks outside of Red Hat to become upstream
> >>>> > contributors and more importantly maintainers of Packstack, then
> that
> >>>> > would alleviate some of the scope creep concerns and perhaps
> Packstack
> >>>> > could be expanded a bit.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > But right now with the majority of the effort solely coming from a
> >>>> > handful of Red Hatters, we just don't have the bandwidth and hence
> the
> >>>> > scope of Packstack was reduced to be purely an all-in-one/demo tool.
> >>>>
> >>>> Well, it was created as a proof-of-concept/demo tool in the first
> place.
> >>>>
> >>>> If you want sophisticated multi-node installer, packstack isn't the
> >>>> right tool for that job.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Good to know, what is the right tool for that job?  I mean multi-node
> >>> installer.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers
> >>>> Jakub
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Rdo-list mailing list
> >>>> Rdo-list at redhat.com
> >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> --
> >>> Edouard Bourguignon
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Rdo-list mailing list
> >>> Rdo-list at redhat.com
> >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Edouard Bourguignon
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rdo-list mailing list
> > Rdo-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> >
>



-- 
Edouard Bourguignon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rdoproject.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20140627/3d0a65c5/attachment.html>