[Rdo-list] Packstack Icehouse changes

[Madko]

2014-06-26 16:44 GMT+02:00 Jakub Ruzicka <jruzicka at redhat.com>:

> On 26.6.2014 15:33, Perry Myers wrote:
> > On 06/26/2014 09:23 AM, Shake Chen wrote:
> >> remove the feature the packstack have been own is not good idea, and
> >> would affect many user.
> >
> > Part of the reason for the reduction in scope of Packstack is due to
> > resource constraints for the team that is working on Packstack, Puppet
> > and Foreman.
> >
> > If we could get some folks outside of Red Hat to become upstream
> > contributors and more importantly maintainers of Packstack, then that
> > would alleviate some of the scope creep concerns and perhaps Packstack
> > could be expanded a bit.
> >
> > But right now with the majority of the effort solely coming from a
> > handful of Red Hatters, we just don't have the bandwidth and hence the
> > scope of Packstack was reduced to be purely an all-in-one/demo tool.
>
> Well, it was created as a proof-of-concept/demo tool in the first place.
>
> If you want sophisticated multi-node installer, packstack isn't the
> right tool for that job.
>
>
Good to know, what is the right tool for that job?  I mean multi-node
installer.


> Cheers
> Jakub
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rdo-list mailing list
> Rdo-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>


Best regards,
-- 
Edouard Bourguignon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rdoproject.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20140626/a96f5875/attachment.html>