[Rdo-list] rdo-release-havana RPM install fails with dependency on foreman-release

[Pádraig Brady]

On 08/05/2013 11:08 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> On 08/05/2013 03:18 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> On 08/05/2013 07:10 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
>>> Heya (Pádraig?),
>>>
>>>
>>> Installing the generic rdo-release-havana RPM pulls in the  rdo-release-havana-3 package
>>> (while earlier it pulled in rdo-release-havana-2)
>>>
>>> As a result of pulling in rdo-release-havana-3, it fails with a dependency on foreman-release:
>>
>> Oops right, catch 22.
>> It works for `yum install rdo-release`,
>> but not with this initial install method
>> when the repo is not in place at all.
>>
>> I've reverted that change now,
> 
> Cool, thanks.
> 
> Do you want to place a quick README denoting there are two milestone packages (m2, m3)
> 
>   http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-havana/
> 
> Or not really needed?

No need I think.
Changes here are usually uninteresting plumbing,
already documented in the rpm -q --changelog.
Scripts/docs reference generic links rather than specific milestones.

> Also, while I have your attention here, maybe we should advertise the usage of
> 'fedora-easy-karma' tool to provide up-votes by people who have been testing stuff with
> updates-testing enabled?
> 
> Packages are languishing in Bodhi:
> 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-14093/openstack-packstack-2013.2.1-0.1.dev691.fc19?_csrf_token=dbacbb6a8f3abee94c659d6805addfa02e0105b1

It would be good to provide feedback from RDO to Fedora.
Note the caveat though where Fedora N+1 is being used
for the RDO Fedora N versions. I.E. the RDO Havana Fedora 19
repo currently contains openstack-packstack-2013.2.1-0.1.dev691.fc20
and whilst currently the same as fc19, may not be generally.
Also this would impact tools auto providing karma from installed versions.
Something to think about indeed.

thanks,
Pádraig.