On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Gerard Braad <me@gbraad.nl> wrote:

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Christopher Brown <cbrown2@ocf.co.uk> wrote:
> However I need to clarify where TripleO QuickStart fits into the
> picture.

I have the exact same question. Especially how this relates to the
current documentation as performed with instack and the future of this
method. It does feel (and is possible) to perform the bare-metal
deployments from quickstart. But what is the expectation for this? At
the moment there is quickstart documentation and the general TripleO
documentation.

--

Gerard Braad | http://gbraad.nl
[ Doing Open Source Matters ]

Couple notes..

We are closing out some work at the moment that will enable tripleo-quickstart to deploy on bare metal.

There are two methods in play here.

1. Use a virtualized undercloud node on the bare metal undercloud physical box.

2. Install the undercloud directly on the bare metal undercloud node.

I'll let Ronelle and Rasca update the status on that.

Secondly,

Tripleo-Quickstart should be able to produce up to date tripleo documentation from it's ci logs.

We'll be exploring this concept in the coming weeks and would welcome any input and help.

Thanks

_______________________________________________
rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list

To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com