I have attached both logs. Traces are there.

My version on F19  :-

[root@openstack1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep openstack
openstack-ceilometer-common-2013.2.1-1.fc20.noarch
openstack-nova-compute-2013.2.1-2.fc20.noarch
openstack-nova-common-2013.2.1-2.fc20.noarch
openstack-nova-cert-2013.2.1-2.fc20.noarch
openstack-utils-2013.2-2.fc20.noarch
openstack-glance-2013.2.1-1.fc20.noarch
openstack-ceilometer-compute-2013.2.1-1.fc20.noarch
openstack-packstack-2013.2.1-0.25.dev936.fc20.noarch
openstack-nova-conductor-2013.2.1-2.fc20.noarch
openstack-nova-scheduler-2013.2.1-2.fc20.noarch
openstack-keystone-2013.2.1-1.fc20.noarch
openstack-nova-api-2013.2.1-2.fc20.noarch
openstack-nova-console-2013.2.1-2.fc20.noarch
openstack-nova-novncproxy-2013.2.1-2.fc20.noarch
openstack-cinder-2013.2.1-1.fc20.noarch

[root@openstack1 ~]# uname -a
Linux openstack1.localdomain 3.12.5-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Dec 17 22:21:14 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux


System on CentOS 6.4 doesn't belong to me.  I am a bit hesitant to ask  system's admin too much
questions.  I am sorry.

Boris.


> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 23:03:54 +0000
> From: pbrady@redhat.com
> To: bderzhavets@hotmail.com
> CC: rdo-list@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Rdo-list] Attempt to reproduce Getting Started with Multi-Node OpenStack RDO Havana + Gluster Backend + Neutron VLAN by Andrew Lau on F19
>
> On 12/23/2013 12:02 PM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> > Original document http://www.andrewklau.com/getting-started-with-multi-node-openstack-rdo-havana-gluster-backend-neutron/
> > contains the sample of answer file. In my situation p37p1 is eth0 p4p1 is eth1 and I've tried to make a substitution in answer-file . packstack fails with error :
>
> > Applying 192.168.1.137_neutron.pp
> > [ ERROR ]
> >
> > ERROR : Error appeared during Puppet run: 192.168.1.127_neutron.pp
> > Error: Validate method failed for class sleep: implicit argument passing of super from method defined by define_method() is not supported. Specify all arguments explicitly.
>
> What are the versions of packstack and puppet on your centos and Fedora 19 systems?
> They should be the same if going from a pristine setup, but if not it would
> be worth trying to match the F19 versions to the working centos one.
>
> If they are in fact the same then it must come down to different
> logic in the puppet modules for Fedora and EL systems, which we'd
> need to look into.
>
> You might get more indication of the particular error in:
> /var/tmp/packstack/...neutron...log
>
> thanks,
> Pádraig.