Hi,

from chatting to a guy who does work with fedora and supports bugs etc. His advice is that because of the fast cycle of fedora releases, they are not suitable for production machines. As such, I'd concur with sticking with RHEL / CentOS.

Regards,

Phill.

On 12 January 2018 at 17:27, Steven Hardy <shardy@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayutin@redhat.com> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> A bug [1] was raised in launchpad and I wanted to get the communities input
> on it.   The background is that atm we only CI TripleO with CentOS and RHEL
> and have documented these two distributions are the ONLY two that have
> community support [2].
>
> Using RDO-Cloud we now have the ability to CI with Fedora.  So the question
> is that something that has enough demand and do we have the resources to CI
> it and provide community support?
>
> Let me know what you think.

I think it's important to be specific here - AFAICS the bug is asking
for *tripleo-quickstart* support of Fedora "at least as the primary
hypervisor", not necessarily for all of TripleO to support Fedora?

I think quickstart support of Fedora as the test node/hypervisor is
desirable (FWIW I used to test like this regularly back when
instack-virt-setup was supported and it worked fine).

Personally I don't think we have the resources (or demand) to support
all of TripleO on Fedora at this point - I think we already have
enough pending work improving our stability and test coverage just on
CentOS in upstream CI.

Thanks,

Steve
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@lists.rdoproject.org
http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscribe@lists.rdoproject.org