2014-06-26 16:44 GMT+02:00 Jakub Ruzicka <jruzicka@redhat.com>:

On 26.6.2014 15:33, Perry Myers wrote:
> On 06/26/2014 09:23 AM, Shake Chen wrote:
>> remove the feature the packstack have been own is not good idea, and
>> would affect many user.
>
> Part of the reason for the reduction in scope of Packstack is due to
> resource constraints for the team that is working on Packstack, Puppet
> and Foreman.
>
> If we could get some folks outside of Red Hat to become upstream
> contributors and more importantly maintainers of Packstack, then that
> would alleviate some of the scope creep concerns and perhaps Packstack
> could be expanded a bit.
>
> But right now with the majority of the effort solely coming from a
> handful of Red Hatters, we just don't have the bandwidth and hence the
> scope of Packstack was reduced to be purely an all-in-one/demo tool.

Well, it was created as a proof-of-concept/demo tool in the first place.

If you want sophisticated multi-node installer, packstack isn't the
right tool for that job.

Good to know, what is the right tool for that job?  I mean multi-node installer.

Cheers
Jakub



_______________________________________________
Rdo-list mailing list
Rdo-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list

Best regards,

--
Edouard Bourguignon

_______________________________________________
Rdo-list mailing list
Rdo-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list