On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Dave Neary <dneary@redhat.com> wrote:

Hi,

On 07/29/2013 02:49 PM, Sandro "red" Mathys wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Dave Neary <dneary@redhat.com
> <mailto:dneary@redhat.com>> wrote:
> I also got a report on the forum on "--os-quantum-install=n" not working
> with F19 Havana packages - has the option name been changed to
> "--os-neutron-install" or something?
>
> The naming has not (yet) been changed in Packstack according to git. See
> https://github.com/stackforge/packstack/blob/master/packstack/plugins/quantum_350.py

Thanks for the pointer. Indeed, the options are still using Quantum,
apparently.
os-quantum-install is defined in
https://github.com/stackforge/packstack/blob/3b8cd49ef8d671418fdb87a35df412b5a9bf25e1/packstack/plugins/prescript_000.py

Not sure what is happening here, then:
https://twitter.com/Metztli_IT/status/360899144488988673

Ah well, some digging brought up the shocking (but rather unsurprising) truth. The Packstack version in F19 is quite old and doesn't include any Quantum support yet. Try the version from updates-testing and everything will be there.

F19 stable:

openstack-packstack-2013.1.1-0.3.dev527.fc19.noarch

EL6/RDO:

openstack-packstack-2013.1.1-0.20.dev642.el6.noarch

F19 updates-testing:

openstack-packstack-2013.1.1-0.21.dev651.fc19.noarch

Packstack not being (up-)karma-ed in Fedora has been a problem for ages already. Fedora Packstack users should finally get involved in Fedora QA. Or if someone in the RDO team does actually test Packstack in Fedora, they should remember giving karma.

-- Sandro

Cheers,
Dave.

--
Dave Neary - Community Action and Impact
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +33 9 50 71 55 62 / Cell: +33 6 77 01 92 13