<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Adam Young <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ayoung@redhat.com" target="_blank">ayoung@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 08/14/2015 09:07 PM, Dave Neary wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi Adam,<br>
<br>
Revising this thread with my own reasons...<br>
<br>
On 08/05/2015 03:33 PM, Adam Young wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
RDO Manager does a lot more than packstack. Too much, for many use<br>
cases, which is why we have people continuing to use packstack. Where do<br>
people use packstack?<br>
<br>
1. Demos<br>
2. Development Work<br>
3. CI<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Installing OpenStack on low-end hardware (1 NIC, no IPMI) <br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
I'm guessing IPMI is a requirement of the Ironic driver.<span class=""><br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
or in VMs with nested virt.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
This would work with the overcloud approach.<span class=""><br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Personally, I have some NUCs for a personal OpenStack cluster. I also have access to an internal OpenStack cloud and I want to test ODL for Neutron on that.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
What it seem like we want is to get the capabilities of the Undercloud installable on a single Fedora box, and then be able to install the Overcloud on top of that. An "undercloud light" based on libvirt?<span class="im HOEnZb"><br>
<br>
<br></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Id plainly like to see a breakdown of how this compares to say FUEL, or HP Helion, or IBMs openstack deployments</div><div>Though Id also like to see someone get RDO to work with XENServer deployments also, seems RDO is pretty much kvm based only</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="im HOEnZb">
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Ultra simple deployment architecture (no HA, one controller, N compute nodes, or all-in-one on a home server).<br>
<br>
Personally, I'm OK manually powering on a host (when prompted) to PXE boot an undercloud host. I don't know if it's even possible, but if we could detect that hosts have only one NIC, using the same NIC for management, data and provisioning, that would be awesome.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Dave.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
_______________________________________________<br>
Rdo-list mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Rdo-list@redhat.com" target="_blank">Rdo-list@redhat.com</a><br>
<a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list</a><br>
<br>
To unsubscribe: <a href="mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com" target="_blank">rdo-list-unsubscribe@redhat.com</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>