<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>I've just found http://kashyapc.wordpress.com/tag/fedora/<br><br>It's done not via packstack and with eth(X) network interfaces<br><br>Thanks.<br>Boris.<br><br><div>> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 23:03:54 +0000<br>> From: pbrady@redhat.com<br>> To: bderzhavets@hotmail.com<br>> CC: rdo-list@redhat.com<br>> Subject: Re: [Rdo-list] Attempt to reproduce Getting Started with Multi-Node OpenStack RDO Havana + Gluster Backend + Neutron VLAN by Andrew Lau on F19<br>> <br>> On 12/23/2013 12:02 PM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:<br>> > Original document http://www.andrewklau.com/getting-started-with-multi-node-openstack-rdo-havana-gluster-backend-neutron/<br>> > contains the sample of answer file. In my situation p37p1 is eth0 p4p1 is eth1 and I've tried to make a substitution in answer-file . packstack fails with error :<br>> <br>> > Applying 192.168.1.137_neutron.pp<br>> > [ ERROR ]<br>> > <br>> > ERROR : Error appeared during Puppet run: 192.168.1.127_neutron.pp<br>> > Error: Validate method failed for class sleep: implicit argument passing of super from method defined by define_method() is not supported. Specify all arguments explicitly.<br>> <br>> What are the versions of packstack and puppet on your centos and Fedora 19 systems?<br>> They should be the same if going from a pristine setup, but if not it would<br>> be worth trying to match the F19 versions to the working centos one.<br>> <br>> If they are in fact the same then it must come down to different<br>> logic in the puppet modules for Fedora and EL systems, which we'd<br>> need to look into.<br>> <br>> You might get more indication of the particular error in:<br>> /var/tmp/packstack/...neutron...log<br>> <br>> thanks,<br>> Pádraig.<br></div> </div></body>
</html>